Team:Imperial College London/Drylab/Protein production/Analysis
From 2009.igem.org
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Imperial/09/TemplateTop}} | {{Imperial/09/TemplateTop}} | ||
{{Imperial/09/Tabs/M1/Modelling}} | {{Imperial/09/Tabs/M1/Modelling}} | ||
- | <font face='Calibri' size='3'><b>Assumptions</b></font><br><br> | + | ===<font face='Calibri' size='3'><b>Assumptions</b></font><br><br>=== |
*<b>LacI assumptions:</b> | *<b>LacI assumptions:</b> | ||
- | **The lac operon represses by constitutively synthesizing the LacI gene product [ | + | **The lac operon represses by constitutively synthesizing the LacI gene product [1]. |
- | **Here we have assumed that all the other complicated dynamical pathways are at dynamic equilibrium [ | + | **Here we have assumed that all the other complicated dynamical pathways are at dynamic equilibrium [2], and we are only considering the LacI gene. |
***If these effects were included, the dynamics of the entire system will be more complicated, and the outcome of the model will be different. | ***If these effects were included, the dynamics of the entire system will be more complicated, and the outcome of the model will be different. | ||
**In a culture grown overnight, levels of LacI expression will have reached steady state. We can assume that this is the case before we add in IPTG. | **In a culture grown overnight, levels of LacI expression will have reached steady state. We can assume that this is the case before we add in IPTG. | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
<font face='Calibri' size='3'><b>The actual model...</b></font> | <font face='Calibri' size='3'><b>The actual model...</b></font> | ||
- | [https://2009.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College_London/Drylab/M1/Protein_production/Analysis/Detailed Click here for details] | + | [https://2009.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College_London/Drylab/M1/Protein_production/Analysis/Detailed Click here for details]. Genetic circuit models are explained extensively in [3]. |
+ | ===References=== | ||
+ | [1] Patrick Wong, Stephanie Gladney, and J. D. Keasling*. Mathematical Model of the lac Operon: Inducer Exclusion, | ||
+ | Catabolite Repression, and Diauxic Growth on Glucose and Lactose. Biotechnol. Prog. 1997, 13, 132-143 | ||
+ | [2]3.Kuhlman T, Zhang Z, Saier MH Jr, & Hwa T (2007) Combinatorial transcriptional control of the lactose operon of Escherichia coli. - PNAS 104 (14) 6043-6048 | ||
+ | [3]2.Alon, U (2006) An Introduction to Systems Biology: Design Principles of Biological Circuits - Chapman & Hall/Crc Mathematical and Computational Biology | ||
{{Imperial/09/TemplateBottom}} | {{Imperial/09/TemplateBottom}} |
Revision as of 19:04, 7 October 2009
- Overview
- The model
- Simulations
Assumptions
- LacI assumptions:
- The lac operon represses by constitutively synthesizing the LacI gene product [1].
- Here we have assumed that all the other complicated dynamical pathways are at dynamic equilibrium [2], and we are only considering the LacI gene.
- If these effects were included, the dynamics of the entire system will be more complicated, and the outcome of the model will be different.
- In a culture grown overnight, levels of LacI expression will have reached steady state. We can assume that this is the case before we add in IPTG.
- IPTG assumptions:
- LacI and IPTG undergo a secondary set of reactions when IPTG is added in. We assume that 1 molecule of IPTG binds to 1 molecule of LacI, creating an intermediate reaction complex:
- We also assume that the concentration of IPTG we put in is below the threshold of toxicity that could significantly start killing our cells. ([http://openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:IMPERIAL/2009/M1/Modelling/Analysis/literatureIPTG Literature review on IPTG])
- In this model we have neglected the degradation rate of IPTG and also of the [IPTG-LacI] complex.
Model Predictions
Taking these assumptions into account, we can predict what the overall Qualitative behavior of the system will be.
- In the absence of IPTG, the output amount of our protein of interest will depend on the steady state of LacI protein.
- If the levels of LacI at steady state are low, we get a relatively high basal production of protein of interest, as the steady state is dependent on the lac promoter strength and its degradation. A weak promoter does not repress sufficiently the production of protein of interest.
- If the levels of LacI at steady state are high, we are repressing more the production of protein of interest, so we will get a lower initial rate of protein production as the Lac promoter is stronger (higher PoPs output)
- If we take into account leakiness of the Lac promoter, we will see a higher basal amount of protein of interest initially than in the non-leaky case.
- When IPTG is added in, it will undergo a secondary reaction with LacI, thus, de-repressing the pathway, so we will see a bump in production of the protein of interest.
- These effects are transient. LacI has a constitutive equilibrium, so after sometime, it will return to its original state and repress production of protein of interest once again.
- The more IPTG we add in, the more LacI we will remove initially from the system, so the more output protein produced for a given period of time.
The actual model... Click here for details. Genetic circuit models are explained extensively in [3].
References
[1] Patrick Wong, Stephanie Gladney, and J. D. Keasling*. Mathematical Model of the lac Operon: Inducer Exclusion, Catabolite Repression, and Diauxic Growth on Glucose and Lactose. Biotechnol. Prog. 1997, 13, 132-143 [2]3.Kuhlman T, Zhang Z, Saier MH Jr, & Hwa T (2007) Combinatorial transcriptional control of the lactose operon of Escherichia coli. - PNAS 104 (14) 6043-6048 [3]2.Alon, U (2006) An Introduction to Systems Biology: Design Principles of Biological Circuits - Chapman & Hall/Crc Mathematical and Computational Biology