Team:Aberdeen Scotland/WetLab/quorumsensing/results

From 2009.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Results and Discussion)
(Results and Discussion)
Line 18: Line 18:
<br><br>
<br><br>
-
MORE TEXT
+
The second control was the SCS1 strain transformed with pTrc99A and pLG. It is expected that when grown with or without IPTG no fluorescence occurs. When grown with IPTG there might occur some fluorescence due to leakiness of the pLux promoter. The results below show hardly any fluorescence for the culture grown without IPTG, but a high fluorescence when grown with IPTG. Measurements of fluorescence were taken after the cells reached an optical density of 0.200 at 600nm. This was chosen because it is suggested that Quorum Sensing only switches on at a much higher density than this.
 +
<br><br>Those results indicate that the Lac operator works as expected and is sufficiently repressed by LacI as no fluorescence occurs without IPTG. However, as no Quorum Sensing construct is transformed into this cell strain, the occuring fluorescence when adding IPTG cannot be due to Quorum Sensing and therefore leads to the belief that the pLux promoter is either extremely leaky or not responsive to LuxR/LuxI and does not function as predicted.
[[Image:PLG_figure.jpg|center|600 px]]
[[Image:PLG_figure.jpg|center|600 px]]

Revision as of 06:36, 28 September 2009

University of Aberdeen iGEM 2009

Results and Discussion

Aims and background for testing our Quorum Sensing construct

In our first experimental set-up, we wanted to test whether our Quorum Sensing construct (further referred to as pIR) works on its own, and induces a pLux promotor to enhance trancription. The testing construct , which was used, consists of a pLux promoter and the gene for the green fluorescence protein. Therefore, it is expected that without Quorum Sensing construct no fluorescence occur.

For this purpose SCS1 E.coli cells were transformed with 1) pIR alone, 2) alone, and 3) pIR and J37032 together. The first one is the negative control. Without any GFP gene inside the cells they should not fluorescence. The second set of cells should show no fluorescence as the promoter needs to be activated by Quorum Sensing or only to a small degree due to leakiness of the promoter. The third set should show low fluorescence at low cell density and high fluorescence at high cell density.

Pictures were taking from over night cultures, i.e. at high cell density, under a light microscope (left hand-side) and a fluorescence microscope (right hand-side) from the 3 different SCS1 E.coli cell transformances. No fluorescence were shown on the pIR only transformance. However, the J37032 transformance shows as high a fluorescent as the double transformance.

J37TEST figure.jpg



Those results suggest that is not responsive to Quorum Sensing as it does not need LuxI/LuxR to produce GFP. Or as an alternative the pLux promoter could be extremely leaky. Hence, the pIR construct was further tested with the pLux responsive promoter construct this team created.

Apart from testing the pIR construct, the AND-gate, i.e. part (further referred to as pLG) was also tested in this experimental set-up. needs two inputs to initiate the transcription of GFP, firstly IPTG to release LacO repression and secondly Quorum Sensing for triggering the pLux promoter.

SCS1 cells were transformed with either 1) pTrc99A and pIR, 2) pTrc99A and pLG or 3) pTrc99A, pIR and pLG. The plasmid pTrc99A contains the gene lacIq which over-produces LacI. This is needed to sufficiently suppress the Lac operator in the pLG construct in the starting cultures. It is expected that a high fluorescence occurs only in the third triple transformed cells and only when IPTG is added and the cells are at a high density. The first one is lacking the gene for GFP and hence should show no fluorescence at all. Whereas, the second one lacks Qourum Sensing producing part and thereby should not show fluorescence at any cell density and whether ITPG is added or not. However, adding IPTG releases the LacO repression and hence some GFP production might result from a leaky promoter.

Below graph and pictures show the negative control. All measurements in this experiments were taken with the help of a fluorimeter at a wavelength of 514.5nm. As this strain of transformances should not have any fluorescence this first set of values were said to be the background reading of the cells and the mean of those values were subtracted from all of the following measurements before the graphs were plotted. Also, under the fluorescence microscope no fluorescence were observed as expected.

PIR figure.jpg



The second control was the SCS1 strain transformed with pTrc99A and pLG. It is expected that when grown with or without IPTG no fluorescence occurs. When grown with IPTG there might occur some fluorescence due to leakiness of the pLux promoter. The results below show hardly any fluorescence for the culture grown without IPTG, but a high fluorescence when grown with IPTG. Measurements of fluorescence were taken after the cells reached an optical density of 0.200 at 600nm. This was chosen because it is suggested that Quorum Sensing only switches on at a much higher density than this.

Those results indicate that the Lac operator works as expected and is sufficiently repressed by LacI as no fluorescence occurs without IPTG. However, as no Quorum Sensing construct is transformed into this cell strain, the occuring fluorescence when adding IPTG cannot be due to Quorum Sensing and therefore leads to the belief that the pLux promoter is either extremely leaky or not responsive to LuxR/LuxI and does not function as predicted.

PLG figure.jpg




MORE TEXT

TRIPLE figure.jpg




MORE TEXT

LGLATE figure.jpg



MORE TEXT

TRIPLELATE figure.jpg