Team:Imperial College London/Wetlab/Results/Cheminduction

From 2009.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Conclusion)
(Experiment:)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Imperial/09/TemplateTop}}
{{Imperial/09/TemplateTop}}
 +
<br><br>
=Experiment:=
=Experiment:=
Different concentrations of IPTG were added to a 96-well plate of e-coli Top 10 cells containing LacI-RFP genetic constructs. Here we measured the optical density of the cells over-time, for different concentrations of IPTG to monitor the effects in the culture. The IPTG growth curve results are plotted below:<br>
Different concentrations of IPTG were added to a 96-well plate of e-coli Top 10 cells containing LacI-RFP genetic constructs. Here we measured the optical density of the cells over-time, for different concentrations of IPTG to monitor the effects in the culture. The IPTG growth curve results are plotted below:<br>

Latest revision as of 21:03, 20 October 2009



Contents

Experiment:

Different concentrations of IPTG were added to a 96-well plate of e-coli Top 10 cells containing LacI-RFP genetic constructs. Here we measured the optical density of the cells over-time, for different concentrations of IPTG to monitor the effects in the culture. The IPTG growth curve results are plotted below:
II09 IPTG growth1.jpg
Figure 1: Effects of [IPTG] on cell growth: Note that the high initial OD value results due to cultures having grown for 1 hour prior the start of the measuring phase.

Analysis

Simply plotting the raw data does not give sufficient information about possible trends. Therefore, further analysis was performed where: 1. The blank absorbance level was estimated
II09 chemo1 blank variation1.png
Figure 2: Variation of the blank well data in monitoring absorbance A1, A2, B1, B2: 4 wells containing blank M9 media.
2. We can see from figure 1 that there is an exponential growth phase that lasts for about 3 hours, so in order to extract the trend in growth rate, the ln(Absorbance) data was plotted over these time points (See figures 3,4,5).
3. In order to extract the trend, a linear regression method was applied and the growth rates were calculated.

II09 IPTG growth 4.jpg
Figure 3: Log plots of the exponential growth phase for different IPTG concentrations
We can see that the growth rate corresponds to the gradient of the linear phase in the graph. This was done for two parallel wells, hence why we have plotted two parallel lines (Scroll to bottom of the page to see all of the plots).

Results

  • Growth rates lie within a range of 0.1-0.2 /hour.
  • The standard deviation was found to be: 0.0093

Conclusion

Growth rate does not vary significantly for different concentrations of IPTG. This means that it does not have a significant impact on growth rate.

More Plots

II09 IPTG growth 2.jpg
Figure 4: Log plots of the exponential growth phase for different IPTG concentrations

II09 IPTG growth 3.jpg
Figure 5: Log plots of the exponential growth phase for different IPTG concentrations

Mr. Gene   Geneart   Clontech   Giant Microbes