Team:LCG-UNAM-Mexico:Journals:Uriel
From 2009.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(→September 30, 2009) |
(→September 30, 2009) |
||
Line 682: | Line 682: | ||
Going back further when I digested for the first time plasmid 12 I did it with SpeI/PstI to allow | Going back further when I digested for the first time plasmid 12 I did it with SpeI/PstI to allow | ||
promoter to be at the beginning of the construction.The insert cox+ogr+ter was digested XbaI/PstI so I think the unique alternative is that promoter ipteg wasn't | promoter to be at the beginning of the construction.The insert cox+ogr+ter was digested XbaI/PstI so I think the unique alternative is that promoter ipteg wasn't | ||
- | in the plasmid. | + | in the plasmid. |
+ | |||
+ | In this circumstance we can only say that we changed cox+ogr+ter from plasmid 18 to plasmid 12 that is resitantant to | ||
+ | Amp. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == October 5, 2009 == | ||
+ | |||
+ | To test for the activity of the multipromoter that we have designed and sent to synthesis we are going to | ||
+ | transform E. coli BL21 strain | ||
|} | |} | ||
<!--Do not remove the first and last lines in this page!-->{{Template:LCG_bottom_Netscape}} | <!--Do not remove the first and last lines in this page!-->{{Template:LCG_bottom_Netscape}} |
Revision as of 04:31, 21 October 2009