Team:UCL London/Ethics/Conclusion

From 2009.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Undo revision 144414 by Anike (Talk))
Line 2: Line 2:
{{Template:UCL_London_Ethics}}
{{Template:UCL_London_Ethics}}
<div id="ucla1">
<div id="ucla1">
-
== Safety ==
+
== Conclusion ==
-
'''Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of:
+
Synthetic Biology unlike Bio-engineering or Biology is a new area in Science and Technology.
-
researcher safety, public safety, or environmental safety?
+
Looking at the results from the questionnaire, alot of people do not understand what synthetic biology is about. The results also convey that people fear that standard biological parts and devices can be modified and used for the harm of the public.
-
 
-
Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?
 
-
 
-
What does your local biosafety group think about your project?
 
-
 
-
Do any of the new BioBrick parts that you made this year raise any safety issues?
 
-
If yes, did you document these issues in the Registry?'''
 
</div>
</div>
{{Template:UCL_London_footer}}
{{Template:UCL_London_footer}}

Revision as of 13:42, 21 October 2009

Conclusion

Synthetic Biology unlike Bio-engineering or Biology is a new area in Science and Technology. Looking at the results from the questionnaire, alot of people do not understand what synthetic biology is about. The results also convey that people fear that standard biological parts and devices can be modified and used for the harm of the public.

Back to top of Page

UCL London IGEM Wiki 2009

UCL main site