"
Minnesota/25 June 2009
From 2009.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
[[Image:Tnnatcvariesleaky5.jpg|480px]][[Image:Tnnexperiment.jpg|480px]]<br> | [[Image:Tnnatcvariesleaky5.jpg|480px]][[Image:Tnnexperiment.jpg|480px]]<br> | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | This model does indeed show some different leakiness, which is definitely a good thing, although the leakiness is still too high for an accurate model. Still, the problem remains where the model peaks and decreases instead of reaching a steady state. | ||
Revision as of 21:03, 30 July 2009
| Back to Notebook Home | |
| Go to Previous Day (June 24) | Go to Next Day (June 26) |
In order to try to improve the model, the following reaction constants were changed to try to see less leakiness in the model.
| Reaction | Forward Kinetic Constant | Reverse Kinetic Constant |
|---|---|---|
| RNAp + tetO1:tetR2 + lacP -> RNAp:lacP + tetR2 | 1200000 | |
| RNAp + tetO1:aTc:tetR2 + lacP -> RNAp:lacP + tetR2 | 1200000 | |
| RNAp + tetO1:aTc2:tetR2 + lacP -> RNAp:lacP + tetR2 | 1200000 |
This model does indeed show some different leakiness, which is definitely a good thing, although the leakiness is still too high for an accurate model. Still, the problem remains where the model peaks and decreases instead of reaching a steady state.
