From 2009.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
|
|
Line 457: |
Line 457: |
| <br> | | <br> |
| <div class="heading"> | | <div class="heading"> |
- | Descriptive Title of What You're Doing
| + | Gel of the vector verification performed yesterday |
| </div> | | </div> |
| <br> | | <br> |
| <div class="desc"> | | <div class="desc"> |
| </html> | | </html> |
- | WIKI CODING HERE
| + | Purpose: to visualise the results of yesterday’s vector verification |
| + | |
| + | Expected restriction digest output: |
| + | |
| + | Biobrick digest (2 fragments) |
| + | * psB1AC3/psB1AK3: ~3.0 kb |
| + | * ccdB (p1010): ~675 bp |
| + | |
| + | TOPO digest (2 fragments) |
| + | * TOPO (T/A and Blunt): ~3.5 kb |
| + | * LuxOU: ~2.0 kb |
| + | * LuxPQ: ~4.0 kb |
| + | * LuxCDABE: ~6.0 kb |
| + | * LuxOD47E: ~1.4 kb |
| + | * LuxOD47A: ~1.4 kb |
| + | |
| + | Results: |
| + | |
| + | Gel and lane description is included below. LuxPQ did not work, so it will need to be sequenced. |
| | | |
| <html> | | <html> |
| + | </div> |
| + | <br> |
| + | <div class="heading"> |
| + | Sequencing of LuxPQ in TOPO Blunt II |
| + | </div> |
| + | <br> |
| + | <div class="desc"> |
| + | </html> |
| + | Purpose: As mentioned above, the results for LuxPQ are very questionable. Since they cannot be explained with restriction digests, hopefully sequencing will alleviate some of the confusion. |
| + | |
| + | Materials and methods: |
| + | We inserted 7.3 uL of LuxPQ in TOPO into a mini PCR tube so that around 730 ng of DNA were present for sequencing. We used the sp6 forward primer and the T7 reverse primer. |
| + | |
| + | Results: |
| + | Much like our previous sequencing attempts, these were questionable. The electronic copy will be inserted shortly. |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | <html> |
| + | |
| </div> | | </div> |
| </td> | | </td> |
Revision as of 22:41, 20 August 2009
University of Calgary
|
CAROL
Descriptive Title of What You’re Doing
WIKI CODING HERE
|
|
CHINMOYEE
More Simbiology
Exploration Results :
Simbiology assumes that all reactions are elementary reactions. For stochastic simulation only the Chemical kinetic and Hill kinetic equations work. Simbiology also produces a diagram of all the reactions input . The diagram view is helpfull in establishing the connections between species when they react or form.
The simbiology simulation graphs produced have a generic y-axis value of state which signifies concentration .
Started to look at other Toolboxes given with the Matlab package.
|
|
EMILY
Descriptive Title of What You're Doing
|
|
FAHD
Descriptive Title of What You're Doing
|
|
IMAN
Descriptive Title of What You're Doing
|
|
JAMIE
Descriptive Title of What You're Doing
|
|
JEREMY
Descriptive Title of What You're Doing
|
|
KATIE
Descriptive Title of What You're Doing
|
|
KEVIN
Cloning Technique
Began looking into biobrick cloning techniques. Reviewed how the parts are put together. If A part is the recepient and B part is the donor, and when B part needs to be put behind of A, the recepient A is cut with SpeI and PstI sites and the donor is cut with XbaI and PstI. When B needs to be put in front of A, the recepient A is cut with EcoRI and Xba, and the donor B is cut with EcoRI and SpeI. When cut Xba and Spe sites meet, it creates a scar, making the construction permenant. (It won't cut apart with the enzymes we use)
|
|
MANDY
Descriptive Title of What You're Doing
|
|
PATRICK
Descriptive Title of What You're Doing
|
|
PRIMA
Descriptive Title of What You're Doing
|
|
STEFAN
Descriptive Title of What You're Doing
|
|
VICKI
Gel of the vector verification performed yesterday
Purpose: to visualise the results of yesterday’s vector verification
Expected restriction digest output:
Biobrick digest (2 fragments)
- psB1AC3/psB1AK3: ~3.0 kb
- ccdB (p1010): ~675 bp
TOPO digest (2 fragments)
- TOPO (T/A and Blunt): ~3.5 kb
- LuxOU: ~2.0 kb
- LuxPQ: ~4.0 kb
- LuxCDABE: ~6.0 kb
- LuxOD47E: ~1.4 kb
- LuxOD47A: ~1.4 kb
Results:
Gel and lane description is included below. LuxPQ did not work, so it will need to be sequenced.
Sequencing of LuxPQ in TOPO Blunt II
Purpose: As mentioned above, the results for LuxPQ are very questionable. Since they cannot be explained with restriction digests, hopefully sequencing will alleviate some of the confusion.
Materials and methods:
We inserted 7.3 uL of LuxPQ in TOPO into a mini PCR tube so that around 730 ng of DNA were present for sequencing. We used the sp6 forward primer and the T7 reverse primer.
Results:
Much like our previous sequencing attempts, these were questionable. The electronic copy will be inserted shortly.
|