"
Team:Imperial College London/M2/EncapsulationRationale
From 2009.igem.org
JamesField (Talk | contribs) (→Phase 1:) |
JamesField (Talk | contribs) (→Phase 1:) |
||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
| <partinfo>BBa_K200003 </partinfo> | | <partinfo>BBa_K200003 </partinfo> | ||
| Coding | | Coding | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
Revision as of 14:51, 10 October 2009
Contents |
Module 2 - Encapsulsation Overview
Encapsulation Rationale
To ferry polypeptides through the stomach, each of our microcapsules must withstand the rigours of a heated protease–rich acid bath. Let there be no illusions, this is no mean feat. The stomach is a highly evolved microbe–mincer that few chassis have the potential to withstand. What is more, since our microcapsules are inanimate, we cannot rely on any of the active acid–resistance strategies that living bacteria are able to deploy.
To tackle this seemingly insurmountable problem we adopted a two phase approach.
Phase 1: Identify a suitable chassis with the genotypic potential for acid–resistance.
Phase 2:Manipulate endogenous acid resistance pathways to control the acid resistant phenotype.
Phase 1:
Our rationale for looking for natural sources of acid resistance is that it is easier to hack existing pathways than to transfer large numbers of genes into a different chassis with a dissimilar genetic background.
Based on natural sources of acid resistance, Lactobacillus, E.coli and B.subtilis were shortlisted as potential chassis.
| Registry Code | Type | Sequence Description | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding
| RcsB is a receiver protein which acts as a positive regulator of a number of genes including capsule genes responsible for colanic acid production. | |||||||
| Coding
| Dam (DNA Adenine Methylase) The methylase encoded by the dam gene ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dam_(methylase) Dam methylase]) transfers a methyl group from S-adenosylmethionine to the N6 position of the adenine residues in the sequence GATC, this protects the DNA from cleavage. | |||||||
| Coding
| Colanic acid global regulator ygiV (B3023) increases the production of colanic acid further in conjunction with RcsB by acting as a repressor for mcbR/yncC promoter. YncC/mcbR normally repress colanic acid overproduction so as to increase biofilm formation. | |||||||
| Coding
B.subtilis: Pros: 1. Can form a highly acid–resistant spore. Cons: 1. Sporulation follows starvation which could result in the destruction of the polypeptides which we are seeking to deliver. 2. Safety. 3. Difficult to work with E.coli Pros: 1. Acid a broad range of acid resistance strategies 2. Probiotic K12 strains available Cons: 1. Can form biofilms which are associated with virulence Lactobacillus: Pros: 1. Acid resistant 2. Safe Cons: 1. Difficult to work with
Based on these criteria, we decided that E.coli was the most suitable chassis.
Phase 2:We hacked E.coli’s acid resistance module in three places to achieve the production of a safe acid resistant capsule. Acid Resistant Polymer – Colanic acid: E.coli naturally produces a harmless acid–resistant polymer known as colanic acid. Colanic acid is a polymer of glucose, galactose and glucuronic acid. By tapping into the pathway that initiates colanic acid biosynthesis, we can turn on its production via the modulation of a transcription factor encoded by gene called RcsB.
 |
