Team:Imperial College London/Major results

From 2009.igem.org

Revision as of 23:41, 21 October 2009 by Tywang (Talk | contribs)

Contents

Major Results

This page contains highlights of our major results and simulations. It is by no means complete. However, more results will be presented at the jamboree.


Genome Digestion Assay

In this assay, we performed a restriction digestion on Dam negative and Dam positive strains, using restriction enzymes DpnII and TaqI, to investigate their effects on the two strains.

Positive results were achieved.

Ii09 111.PNG


From the gels above, we notice that there are 'smears'in the gels for the Dam negative strains. These 'smears'are created when the Dam negative strains are fully cleaved at all different concentrations of restriction enzyme. As the cleaved DNA fragments are all of varying, but short lengths, a smear is produced.

From these results, we have shown that restriction enzymes can cleave Dam negative strains, hence killing Dam negative cells. This also proves Dam positive strains are protected again genomic deletion.


  • Furthermore, the dry lab has provided a model on cell population under the production of restriction enzymes.
M3s.6.png

We have shown that an increase in restriction enzyme concentration will cause a decrease total cell population, under the absence of Dam protection.











Module Integration - Autoinduction

  • Experiments were performed on the CRP promoter. From this experiment, we are able to choose the best media for the optimal growth of cells.

Ii09 112.PNG

Corrected fluorescence of glucose is almost negligible. From this, we have proved the theory that glucose represses the PcstA promoter strongly.

Also, 10% Casamino Acids in M9 shows the highest corrected fluorescence as well as a high corrected OD600, indicating good cell growth. Therefore, this is our media of choice.



diauxic growth

Module Integration - Thermoinduction

To investigate the behaviour of the lamda-cI thermoinducible promoter and show that when temperature is low (at 28 degrees Celsius), there is low fluorescence output. This shows that the genome deletion module is repressed. When temperature is raised to 42 degrees Celsius, fluorescence increases, indicating that the repression is lifted. We are looking at both absorbance and fluorescence data. This analysis serves to characterize the construct BBa_K200022, submitted by Harvard last year.

The characterization of the thermoinducible promoter is as follows:

  • At 28 ºC, we cannot observe any fluorescence (GFP) output because its expression is repressed
  • At 42 ºC, we can observe an increase in fluorescence (GFP) output, as its expression is no longer repressed

Hence, we can conclude that in the E.ncapsulator system, an increase in temperature de-represses the expression of downstream genes, which trigger the genome deletion phase. II09 HVD GFP MAIN.png


References

[1]Physica A: Statistical and Theoretical Physics, Vol. 188, No. 1-3. (1 September 1992), pp. 404-425. A rigorous derivation of the chemical master Equation

Mr. Gene   Geneart   Clontech   Giant Microbes