"
Team:Imperial College London/Wetlab/Results/Cheminduction
From 2009.igem.org
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Simply plotting the raw data does not give sufficient information about possible trends. | Simply plotting the raw data does not give sufficient information about possible trends. | ||
Therefore, further analysis was performed where: | Therefore, further analysis was performed where: | ||
| - | 1. The blank absorbance level was estimated | + | 1. The blank absorbance level was estimated<br> |
| - | [[Image: | + | [[Image:II09_chemo1_blank_variation1.png]] |
| - | + | <b>Figure 2: Variation of the blank well data in monitoring absorbance</b> A1, A2, B1, B2: 4 wells containing blank M9 media. | |
{{Imperial/09/TemplateBottom}} | {{Imperial/09/TemplateBottom}} | ||
Revision as of 20:24, 20 October 2009
Experiment:
Different concentrations of IPTG were added to a 96-well plate [link to assay] of e-coli Top 10 cells containing LacI-RFP genetic constructs. Here we measured the optical density of the cells over-time, for different concentrations of IPTG to monitor the effects in the culture. The IPTG growth curve results are plotted below:
Figure 1: Effects of [IPTG] on cell growth: Note that the high initial OD value results due to cultures having grown for 1 hour prior the start of the measuring phase.
Simply plotting the raw data does not give sufficient information about possible trends.
Therefore, further analysis was performed where:
1. The blank absorbance level was estimated
Figure 2: Variation of the blank well data in monitoring absorbance A1, A2, B1, B2: 4 wells containing blank M9 media.
