Team:EPF-Lausanne/Results

From 2009.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
m (Fusion of LOV domain trpR DNA-binding domain)
m (Fusion of the LOV domain nd the trpR DNA-binding domain)
Line 9: Line 9:
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
-
=Fusion of the LOV domain nd the trpR DNA-binding domain=
+
=Fusion of the LOV domain and the trpR DNA-binding domain=
The first step in our computational study of the LOV domain was to fuse the 2 domains of interest in VMD. We were then able to visualize the different proteins tried by Sosnick.
The first step in our computational study of the LOV domain was to fuse the 2 domains of interest in VMD. We were then able to visualize the different proteins tried by Sosnick.
The working protein, that we call LovTAP is the result of the fusion at PHE22 and can be seen on the next video. The general LOV domain is in yellow. Please note the chromophore called Flavin (FMN) in red in the center of LOV2. The trpR dna binding domain is in orange and DNA in gray.
The working protein, that we call LovTAP is the result of the fusion at PHE22 and can be seen on the next video. The general LOV domain is in yellow. Please note the chromophore called Flavin (FMN) in red in the center of LOV2. The trpR dna binding domain is in orange and DNA in gray.

Revision as of 15:22, 17 October 2009

Contents






Results of Modeling



Fusion of the LOV domain and the trpR DNA-binding domain

The first step in our computational study of the LOV domain was to fuse the 2 domains of interest in VMD. We were then able to visualize the different proteins tried by Sosnick. The working protein, that we call LovTAP is the result of the fusion at PHE22 and can be seen on the next video. The general LOV domain is in yellow. Please note the chromophore called Flavin (FMN) in red in the center of LOV2. The trpR dna binding domain is in orange and DNA in gray.

We also modelized the other fusion tried by Sosnick.

  • @MET11
  • @ALA12
  • @GLU13
  • ...
  • @PHE22
  • ...
  • @LEU25

         Clear here to view the other fusions

Equilibration of light and dark state

Here is our first movie from the modeling, showing the behavior of the protein in the dark state condition: Dark State

Dark state

After having modified some parameters in the parameter files, here is our second movie, concerning the light state of the protein this time, with the FMN: Light State

Light state

Analysis

  • Maxwell-Boltzmann Energy Distribution

We obtain the following histogramm! Energy


  • Temperature

Using EXCEL, we obtain the following graph, which represents the evolution of the temperature in function of time:
Temp(t).png
The first part corresponds the the heating, then we let the system reach an equilibrium (NPT state), a NVT portion, and finally a NPT portion again.


  • Density

Using EXCEL, we obtain the following graph, which represents the evolution of the density in function of time:
Density.jpg
The first part corresponds the the heating, then we let the system reach an equilibrium (NPT state), a NVT portion, and finally a NPT portion again.


  • Pressure

Here is a small plot of pressure and temperature in function of time Run


  • RMSD


We obtain the following picture:
RMSD CA per res.jpg

RMSD of residue within 3 angström of the FMN

Resid 3A.jpg

We can see that the residues that move the most are the residue number: 425, 451, 453



RMSD of residue within 6 angström of the FMN

Resid 6A.jpg
We can see that the residues that move the most are the residue number: 424, 425, 464, 468


  • RMSD of selected atoms compared to initial position along time

Here is a fast graph of the output of the average RMSD of the atoms in function of time. It seems normal.
Rmsd.jpg


Here is what we got with FIRST_FRAME=1115 REFERENCE_FRAME=1115. Average=921.477, standard deviation=202.1708
RMSD plateau.jpg


FIRST_FRAME=0 REFERENCE_FRAME=0. The difference of the sum probably comes from the new selection of atoms from the backbone. We should compute an average value to normalize amplitude. (fluctuation is conserved, anyway) Average=781.3913, standard deviation=118.1393
RMSD COMPLETE RUN.jpg


  • Salt bridges

Here is a plot for one of the bridges. We have to look for the max distance for a salt bridge. Salt bridge.jpg


  • RMSF

2v02 1ns rmsf.jpg

This is a 1 nanosecond NPT run at 300°K. We hope to see a RMSF curve identical to the beta factor. It should only be shifted higher because of the increased temperature. But having a similar tendency would mean our simulation show oscillations similar to what was observed during crystallography. This is really a quite nice validation of our run!


Differential analysis

Some useful distances

  • Bond between Gln497 and Lys533 in dark state

bond1


  • Bond between Gln475 and Lys533 in dark state

bond2