Team:Slovenia/Biobrick

From 2009.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(20 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
Content=
Content=
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
-
=Improved BioBrick Standard=
+
<br>
-
 
+
<html><center>
-
For a multitude reasons we would like to work with the upgrade of 2007 Freiburg iGEM proposed standard (Assembly standard 25). The upgrade includes altered multiple-cloning site which enables friendly scar after part ligation and simple extension of linker between parts.
+
<font size="6" color="#009ee0"><b>BioBRICKS</b></font>
-
 
+
</center></html><br><br>
-
=====Advantages:=====
+
The goal of our project was to investigate and demonstrate the feasibility of polypeptide assembly based on modular nanoBricks. Potentials of this approach are vast (see Discussion and Vision) and for the development of applications it is essential to have available a large collection of “nuts and bolts” to assemble polypeptide nanostructures. We produced all together more than 100 BioBricks, which comprise a significant number of different natural as well as designed coiled-coil forming segments as well as different polypeptide oligomerization domains. In addition we prepared several “functional polypeptides”, which provide additional useful features to the material, such as different biological activities (antimicrobial peptide, growth factors, cell attachment motifs…), optical properties, enzymatic activity...
-
**in-frame fusion of protein parts
+
<br>
-
**benign protein scar/scars
+
<br>
-
**preserving standard restriction sites of prefix and suffix
+
On the other hand we extended the BioBrick standard by introducing sites that allow extension of peptide linker sequences. Length of the linkers between polypeptide domains is crucial to determine the accessible geometry of the assembly, and our extended standard provides a tool to extend the length of a linker by any required length in increments of two residues. This task, particularly concerning small extensions would otherwise require the preparation of a new domain construct.  
-
**four new restriction sites are added in multiple-cloning site
+
<br>
-
**heat inactivation??
+
<br>
-
**no Dam methylation problem for XbaI
+
<html>
-
**stand-alone protein expression
+
<center> <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/c/c0/Bio1.GIF" align="center" width="550" height="344" border="0" />
-
**full BBb compatibility and
+
<br>
-
**blunt-cutting isochizomer of NgoMIV (NaeI) and XmaI (SmaI) possibility of directional cloning with two
+
<br>
-
restriction enzymes enables part transfer between different formats and other potentially interesting transfer reactions
+
</center>
-
 
+
</html>
-
=====Disadvantages:=====
+
<br>
-
**unexpected site effects for users not aware of different prefix/suffix
+
<br>
-
**N-parts could be assembled with different enzyme combination
+
-
**not compatible to BioFusion format (frame shift; stop codon)
+
-
**not compatible to BBb format (Berkeley format)
+
-
**additional limitations on the nucleotide sequence to avoid additional restriction sites
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
Here we describe sequence properties of modified vector BioBrick-NIC-II. All sequences defined herein are specified in the 5' to 3' direction.
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
===BioBrick-NIC-II originates from standard Biobrick vector===
+
-
The difference is in multiple cloning sites.  
+
-
 
+
-
The main reasons for changing multiple cloning sites are:
+
-
#Defined position of promoter and terminator from coding sequence coded with part or parts, which ensures efficient transcription and translation of protein; and
+
-
#Additional sequences linked to parts, which could be exploited when linker is needed between combined parts.
+
-
 
+
-
Although most promoters and RBS and tags and terminators are currently specified as separate parts in the Registry, we will use a new design in which these elements are included within the vector, as we plan to prepare and isolate many proteins and this design will also decrease the number of required cloning steps and will be suesull for others desiring to prepare recombinant proteins in E.coli. We expect the new design will reduce the likelihood of unexpected functional composition problems between promoter / terminator and coding sequence.
+
-
 
+
-
The BioBrick-NIC-II vector is especially appropriate for cloning and combining parts coding short peptides.
+
-
 
+
-
The current assembly process requires certain sequence properties for the part and the surrounding DNA.
+
-
 
+
-
''prefix: 5' gaattc(EcoRI) gcggccgc(NotI) promoter (invariant region) tctaga(XbaI) gccggc(NgoMIV) accggt(AgeI)''
+
-
''suffix: 5' cccggg(XmaI) tccgga(BspEI) terminator (invariant region) gcggccg(NotI) ctgcag(PstI)''
+
-
 
+
-
===Multiple-cloning site===
+
 +
For further information see:
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
<html>
 +
<p>
 +
<ul>
 +
<li><a href="https://2009.igem.org/Team:Slovenia/Linker-extension_standard.html" class="plavo">Linker-extension standard</a><br /></li>
 +
<li><a href="https://2009.igem.org/Team:Slovenia/nanoBRICKs.html" class="plavo">nanoBRICKs PRO</a><br /></li>
 +
<br>
 +
<li><a href="https://2009.igem.org/Deposited_BioBricks.html" class="plavo">Deposited BioBRICKS</a><br /></li>
 +
<br>
 +
<li><a href="https://2009.igem.org/Favourite_Parts.html" class="plavo">Favourite Parts</a><br /></li>
 +
</ul></p>
 +
</html>
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 02:48, 22 October 2009



BioBRICKS


The goal of our project was to investigate and demonstrate the feasibility of polypeptide assembly based on modular nanoBricks. Potentials of this approach are vast (see Discussion and Vision) and for the development of applications it is essential to have available a large collection of “nuts and bolts” to assemble polypeptide nanostructures. We produced all together more than 100 BioBricks, which comprise a significant number of different natural as well as designed coiled-coil forming segments as well as different polypeptide oligomerization domains. In addition we prepared several “functional polypeptides”, which provide additional useful features to the material, such as different biological activities (antimicrobial peptide, growth factors, cell attachment motifs…), optical properties, enzymatic activity...

On the other hand we extended the BioBrick standard by introducing sites that allow extension of peptide linker sequences. Length of the linkers between polypeptide domains is crucial to determine the accessible geometry of the assembly, and our extended standard provides a tool to extend the length of a linker by any required length in increments of two residues. This task, particularly concerning small extensions would otherwise require the preparation of a new domain construct.





For further information see:



Locations of visitors to this page