Team:TUDelft/Conjugation Results

From 2009.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 46: Line 46:
==Verification and Characterization of trbK entry exclusion protein==
==Verification and Characterization of trbK entry exclusion protein==
 +
A conjugation test was done using our [[Team:TUDelft/ConjugationProtocol | conjugation protocol]] to verify that expression of [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K175001 trbK] blocked conjugation.
 +
 +
'''Donors''': [http://www.cbs.knaw.nl/databases/nccb/search_bac_plas.aspx NCCBNr# 2350] cells with R751 (TRI)<br>
 +
'''Receivers''': DH5 &alpha; cells expressing [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K175001 trbK] (CAM) <br>
 +
'''Transconjugants''': DH5 &alpha; cells with R751 and expressing [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K175001 trbK] (TRI+CAM)<br>
 +
'''Receivers Control''': DH5 &alpha; cells with [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_I13522 I13522] (AMP) <br>
 +
'''Transconjugants Control''': DH5 &alpha; cells with R751 and [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_I13522 I13522] (TRI+AMP)<br>
 +
 +
The positive control test used the same donors but different receivers, as detailed above.
 +
 +
{| border="1" align="center"
 +
|- align="center"
 +
| Set # || Conjugation Efficinecy
 +
|- align="center"
 +
| trbK 1 || 4.49E-6
 +
|- align="center"
 +
| trbK 2 || 2.89E-6
 +
|- align="center"
 +
| control || 0.031
 +
|- align="center"
 +
|}
 +
 +
[[Image:TUD_aug18_trbK_efficinecy.png]]
 +
 +
We can see from this graph that expression of trbK does indeed reduce the conjugation efficiency by four orders of magnitude. With this we have a method to prevent back propagation of the signal and we now have receiver side control over communication.

Revision as of 20:49, 19 October 2009

Conjugation Results

Verification and Characterization of Wild R751

A conjugation test was done using our conjugation protocol to determine wild R751 conjugation efficiency.

Donors: [http://www.cbs.knaw.nl/databases/nccb/search_bac_plas.aspx NCCBNr# 2350] cells with R751 (TRI)
Receivers: DH5 α cells with [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_I13522 I13522] (AMP)
Transconjugants: DH5 α cells with R751 and [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_I13522 I13522] (TRI+AMP)

The following table shows the calculated conjugation efficiencies (raw data here):

Data Set Conjugation Efficiency
1 0.028
2 0.028
3 0.025

Verification and Characterization of trbK entry exclusion protein

A conjugation test was done using our conjugation protocol to verify that expression of [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K175001 trbK] blocked conjugation.

Donors: [http://www.cbs.knaw.nl/databases/nccb/search_bac_plas.aspx NCCBNr# 2350] cells with R751 (TRI)
Receivers: DH5 α cells expressing [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K175001 trbK] (CAM)
Transconjugants: DH5 α cells with R751 and expressing [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K175001 trbK] (TRI+CAM)
Receivers Control: DH5 α cells with [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_I13522 I13522] (AMP)
Transconjugants Control: DH5 α cells with R751 and [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_I13522 I13522] (TRI+AMP)

The positive control test used the same donors but different receivers, as detailed above.

Set # Conjugation Efficinecy
trbK 1 4.49E-6
trbK 2 2.89E-6
control 0.031

TUD aug18 trbK efficinecy.png

We can see from this graph that expression of trbK does indeed reduce the conjugation efficiency by four orders of magnitude. With this we have a method to prevent back propagation of the signal and we now have receiver side control over communication.


Verification and Characterization of Conjugation Testing Plasmid 1

A conjugation test was done using our conjugation protocol to verify that [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K175005 Conjugation Testing Plasmid 1] was transmitted during conjugation.

Donors: [http://www.cbs.knaw.nl/databases/nccb/search_bac_plas.aspx NCCBNr# 2350] cells with R751 and [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K175005 Conjugation Testing Plasmid 1] (TRI+CAM)
Receivers: DH5 α cells with [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_J23100 J23100] (AMP)
Transconjugants A: DH5 α cells with R751 and [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_J23100 J23100] (TRI+AMP)
Transconjugants B: DH5 α cells with [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K175005 Conjugation Testing Plasmid 1] and [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_J23100 J23100] (CAM+AMP)

The following table shows the calculated conjugation efficiencies (raw data here):

Set # Conjugation Efficiency for Conjugation Testing Plasmid 1 Conjugation Efficiency for wild R751
1 0.00177 0.0141
2 0.00224 0.0476
3 n/a 0.0356


The reason for the lower efficiency of [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K175005 Conjugation Testing Plasmid 1] compared to R751 is the presence of the entry exclusion protein trbK. If a receiver cell gets Conjugation Testing Plasmid 1, it can still receive R751 afterwards. But if a receiver cell gets R751, it will not accept Conjugation Testing Plasmid 1 afterwards because trbK expression will block incoming transfers.

This test will be redone with R751 ΔoriTR cells once they are available.


R751 Gene Knockouts