EPF-Lausanne/4 September 2009

From 2009.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(→Characterization)
(→Characterization)
Line 33: Line 33:
The plot shows that we still have trouble with the media... Only LB did show a "responsive pattern". All our synthetic media had a flat linear increase in fluoresence over time, for an unknown reason.
The plot shows that we still have trouble with the media... Only LB did show a "responsive pattern". All our synthetic media had a flat linear increase in fluoresence over time, for an unknown reason.
-
<br> -> Maybe it is that there are all minimal and that the cells need more than 2h to make protein synthesis  
+
<br> → Maybe it is that there are all minimal and that the cells need more than 2h to make protein synthesis  
For this test we actually did a mistake while picking the clones for the culture and we picked 3 out of which 2 didn't have the construct -confirmed by colony PCR- (therefore only the RBS-RFP-term).
For this test we actually did a mistake while picking the clones for the culture and we picked 3 out of which 2 didn't have the construct -confirmed by colony PCR- (therefore only the RBS-RFP-term).
-
<br> -> only the 2 "wrong" clones showed a response! The one that actually had the readout 2 construct had the same fluorescent pattern as all the synthetic media pattern.
+
<br> → only the 2 "wrong" clones showed a response! The one that actually had the readout 2 construct had the same fluorescent pattern as all the synthetic media pattern.
Line 43: Line 43:
* with trp: linear increase of fluorescence for the 2h.
* with trp: linear increase of fluorescence for the 2h.
<br>The difference is then after the 1h30 where the ones induced with trp still had an increase in fluorescence while the other had not.
<br>The difference is then after the 1h30 where the ones induced with trp still had an increase in fluorescence while the other had not.
-
 
-
> As we got our readout1 (confirmed by PCR on miniprep + digestion assay), we
 
-
> will do the following test on Monday: all in LB (while waiting for a better
 
-
> option)
 
-
> -Our 3 "right" clones of readout 2, induced by trp, Atc and nothing
 
-
> -Our 3 readout 1 (confirmed) induced by trp and nothing
 
-
> -A control of the "evolution of fluorescence over time" using the LacI
 
-
> inducible RFP from the registry that we have. This, at least, we know won't
 
-
> have any interferences.
 
==People in the lab==
==People in the lab==

Revision as of 07:48, 7 September 2009



Contents

4 September 2009




Wet Lab

Characterization

Multicomponent plot

The plot shows that we still have trouble with the media... Only LB did show a "responsive pattern". All our synthetic media had a flat linear increase in fluoresence over time, for an unknown reason.
→ Maybe it is that there are all minimal and that the cells need more than 2h to make protein synthesis

For this test we actually did a mistake while picking the clones for the culture and we picked 3 out of which 2 didn't have the construct -confirmed by colony PCR- (therefore only the RBS-RFP-term).
→ only the 2 "wrong" clones showed a response! The one that actually had the readout 2 construct had the same fluorescent pattern as all the synthetic media pattern.


The 2 "wrong" clones had the following graph:

  • without Trp: net linear increase of fluorescence for 1h30 then sudden change and the fluorescent slope went flat for the last 30 min.
  • with trp: linear increase of fluorescence for the 2h.


The difference is then after the 1h30 where the ones induced with trp still had an increase in fluorescence while the other had not.

People in the lab

Basile, Mélanie, Caroline



Retrieved from "http://2009.igem.org/EPF-Lausanne/4_September_2009"