"
EPF-Lausanne/9 September 2009
From 2009.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(→Characterization) |
|||
| Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
RBS was our negative control. We can see that there is no RFP fluorescence (because of course RBS has no RFP gene). | RBS was our negative control. We can see that there is no RFP fluorescence (because of course RBS has no RFP gene). | ||
| - | For LacI-RFP + IPTG : | + | For LacI-RFP 1 + IPTG : |
[[Image:IPTG.jpg|center|LacI-RFP + IPTG plot]] | [[Image:IPTG.jpg|center|LacI-RFP + IPTG plot]] | ||
| + | LacI-RFP 2 + IPTG show the same tendancy. | ||
| + | RO1#1 + 0.5 TRP : | ||
| + | [[Image:RO1105TRP.jpg|center|RO1#1 +0.5 TRP]] | ||
| + | RO1#2 + 0.5 TRP shows the same tendancy. | ||
==People in the lab== | ==People in the lab== | ||
Revision as of 10:52, 2 October 2009
Wet Lab
Characterization
| With Atc | Without Atc | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| With Trp |
| 1/2 Trp 1 Trp 3/2 Trp | ||
| Without Trp | 1/2 Atc 1 Atc 3/2 Atc | Without Atc nor Trp |
Results of the characterization
For the RBS :
RBS was our negative control. We can see that there is no RFP fluorescence (because of course RBS has no RFP gene).
For LacI-RFP 1 + IPTG :
LacI-RFP 2 + IPTG show the same tendancy.
RO1#1 + 0.5 TRP :
RO1#2 + 0.5 TRP shows the same tendancy.
People in the lab
Mélanie, Caroline, Basile, Nicolas
