EPF-Lausanne/9 September 2009
From 2009.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(→Characterization) |
(→Characterization) |
||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
RO1#1 + 1 TRP : | RO1#1 + 1 TRP : | ||
[[Image:RO111TRP.jpg|center|RO1#1 + 1 TRP]] | [[Image:RO111TRP.jpg|center|RO1#1 + 1 TRP]] | ||
+ | Again, RO1#2 clone has the same behaviour. | ||
RO1#1 without TRP: | RO1#1 without TRP: | ||
[[Image:RO11.jpg|center|RO1#1 - TRP]] | [[Image:RO11.jpg|center|RO1#1 - TRP]] | ||
+ | Clone #2 has the same behaviour. | ||
==People in the lab== | ==People in the lab== |
Revision as of 10:55, 2 October 2009
Wet Lab
Characterization
With Atc | Without Atc | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
With Trp |
| 1/2 Trp 1 Trp 3/2 Trp | ||
Without Trp | 1/2 Atc 1 Atc 3/2 Atc | Without Atc nor Trp |
Results of the characterization
For the RBS :
RBS was our negative control. We can see that there is no RFP fluorescence (because of course RBS has no RFP gene).
For LacI-RFP 1 + IPTG :
LacI-RFP 2 + IPTG show the same tendancy.
RO1#1 + 0.5 TRP :
RO1#2 + 0.5 TRP shows the same tendancy.
RO1#1 + 1 TRP :
Again, RO1#2 clone has the same behaviour.
RO1#1 without TRP:
Clone #2 has the same behaviour.
People in the lab
Mélanie, Caroline, Basile, Nicolas