EPF-Lausanne/9 September 2009

From 2009.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)

Revision as of 11:11, 2 October 2009

Wet Lab

Characterization

With Atc

Without Atc

With Trp

1/2 Trp + 1/2 Atc 1 Trp + 1/2 Atc	1/2 Trp + 1 Atc 1 Trp + 1 Atc

1/2 Trp
1 Trp
3/2 Trp

Without Trp

1/2 Atc
1 Atc
3/2 Atc

Without Atc nor Trp

Results of the characterization

For the RBS :

RBS was our negative control. We can see that there is no RFP fluorescence (because of course RBS has no RFP gene).

For LacI-RFP 1 + IPTG :

LacI-RFP 2 + IPTG show the same tendancy.

For Read Out 1

RO1#1 + 0.5 TRP :

RO1#2 + 0.5 TRP shows the same tendancy.

RO1#1 + 1 TRP :

Again, RO1#2 clone has the same behaviour.

RO1#1 without TRP:

Clone #2 has the same behaviour.

RO1#3 clones doesn't follow these tendancy. It actually seems that this clone isn't working at all. It is possible a spontaneous mutation occured in some place... On all different conditions, RO1#3 clones show a flat curve, like RBS. It doesn't express RFP which means either our construct wasn't inserted, either there has been a mutation in it.

For Read Out 2

People in the lab

Mélanie, Caroline, Basile, Nicolas

@@ Line 61: / Line 61: @@
 [[Image:IPTG.jpg|center|LacI-RFP + IPTG plot]]
 LacI-RFP 2 + IPTG show the same tendancy.
+'''For Read Out 1'''
 RO1#1 + 0.5 TRP :
@@ Line 75: / Line 78: @@
 RO1#3 clones doesn't follow these tendancy. It actually seems that this clone isn't working at all. It is possible a spontaneous mutation occured in some place... On all different conditions, RO1#3 clones show a flat curve, like RBS. It doesn't express RFP which means either our construct wasn't inserted, either there has been a mutation in it.
+'''For Read Out 2'''
 ==People in the lab==