Revision as of 13:51, 13 October 2009

Meetings Calendar

Chassis

Introduction

The main aim of our project is to sequester cadmium in the environment into the spores of our engineered B. subtilis, but what happens after the cadmium has been sequestered?

Do we attempt to retrieve the sequestered cadmium? Or, do we simply leave the sequestered cadmium in the spores of our engineered B. subtilis?

For our project, we have chosen the latter. We will not be attempting to retrieve the sequestered cadmium. However, then comes the question of, would there not be chances of the cadmium entering the environment again?

Our solution to this question would be to disable germination of the spores, thus retrieval of the sequestered cadmium becomes unnecessary, as the spores can persist intact for thousands of years.

In order to disable germination of the spores, we would require non-germinating spores, and we were fortunate enough that Prof. Anne Moir from Sheffield University kindly sent us two non-germination spores, namely cwlD, and sleB and cwlJ.

While we would like to disable germination, it is essential that we still have some cells germinating, so that our population of bacteria can continue to live and grow, reaching a balance, and not simply depleting totally.

Therefore, a mechanism is needed to allow us to choose to turn on germination, when the cell is not a "metal container".

Using the treatment protocol for the non-germination spores from Prof. Anne Moir, we performed lab experiments for the two non-germination spores, and concluded that the double-knockout mutant, sleB and cwlJ would be more ideal for our project as it had more colonies growing after treatment, and less colonies growing without treatment, as compared to the single knock-out mutant, cwlD.

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 In order to disable germination of the spores, we would require non-germinating spores, and we were fortunate enough that Prof. Anne Moir from Sheffield University kindly sent us two non-germination spores, namely cwlD, and sleB and cwlJ.
-Using the [https://2009.igem.org/Team:Newcastle/Project/Labwork/MoreProtocols#Recovery_of_cwlD_spores protocol] given to us, we performed lab experiments for the two non-germination spores, and concluded that the double-knockout mutant, sleB and cwlJ would be more ideal for our project as it had more colonies growing after treatment, and less colonies growing without treatment, as compared to the single knock-out mutant, cwlD.
+While we would like to disable germination, it is essential that we still have some cells germinating, so that our population of bacteria can continue to live and grow, reaching a balance, and not simply depleting totally.
+Therefore, a mechanism is needed to allow us to choose to turn on germination, when the cell is not a "metal container".
+Using the [https://2009.igem.org/Team:Newcastle/Project/Labwork/MoreProtocols#Recovery_of_cwlD_spores treatment protocol] for the non-germination spores from Prof. Anne Moir, we performed lab experiments for the two non-germination spores, and concluded that the double-knockout mutant, sleB and cwlJ would be more ideal for our project as it had more colonies growing after treatment, and less colonies growing without treatment, as compared to the single knock-out mutant, cwlD.
+We propose that we could use IPTG as a switch for germination.
 ==Novelty in this sub-project==

Team:Newcastle/Chassis

From 2009.igem.org

Revision as of 13:51, 13 October 2009

Chassis

Introduction

Novelty in this sub-project

Modelling

BioBrick constructs

Lab Work Strategies

Other Presentations and Diagrams