"
Team:TUDelft/SDP Futurework
From 2009.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Tim Weenink (Talk | contribs) (New page: {{Template:TUDelftiGEM2009_menu_M2_SDP}} ='''Future Work'''= The most obvious improvement for future work on a self destructive plasmid would be to replace the LVA-tagged I-SceI homing e...) |
Tim Weenink (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
='''Future Work'''= | ='''Future Work'''= | ||
| - | The most obvious improvement for future work on a self destructive plasmid would be to replace the LVA-tagged I-SceI homing endonuclease in <partinfo> | + | The most obvious improvement for future work on a self destructive plasmid would be to replace the LVA-tagged I-SceI homing endonuclease in <partinfo>BBa_K175045</partinfo> by a wildtype sequence. I-SceI protein with the wildtype sequence is commercially available and has been shown to work. The restriction site and reporter gene have been shown to work, so these would not require immediate attention. Possibly the restriction site could be integrated into the reporter gene sequence, so that cleavage would immediately block transcription of the reporter gene. |
{{Template:TUDelftiGEM2009_end}} | {{Template:TUDelftiGEM2009_end}} | ||
Latest revision as of 03:30, 22 October 2009
Future Work
The most obvious improvement for future work on a self destructive plasmid would be to replace the LVA-tagged I-SceI homing endonuclease in by a wildtype sequence. I-SceI protein with the wildtype sequence is commercially available and has been shown to work. The restriction site and reporter gene have been shown to work, so these would not require immediate attention. Possibly the restriction site could be integrated into the reporter gene sequence, so that cleavage would immediately block transcription of the reporter gene.
