Team:Groningen/Project Plan/Risk List
From 2009.igem.org
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|6 | |6 | ||
- | |[[https://2008.igem.org/Team:TU_Munchen]] Probably had too low budget because they started only in June with looking for sponsoring | + | |[[https://2008.igem.org/Team:TU_Munchen|TU München]] Probably had too low budget because they started only in June with looking for sponsoring |
|H | |H | ||
|A budget plan has been made. Roles are divided, two people are working on letters/flyers/poster for sponsoring. | |A budget plan has been made. Roles are divided, two people are working on letters/flyers/poster for sponsoring. |
Revision as of 15:03, 2 May 2009
[http://2009.igem.org/Team:Groningen http://2009.igem.org/wiki/images/f/f1/Igemhomelogo.png]
|
|
|
|
---|
Introduction
Every project has to deal with risks. To ensure a smoothly running project without too many large hiccups it is important to identify these risks and develop strategies to avoid them (and/or reduce their impact).
The table below, shows the possible risks that may influence the success of the iGEM project. It gives an outline of 5 main risks, namely problems which emerge from finances, time span, lab work, modeling and members / instructors. Possible risks were traced from the problems of iGEM Groningen 2008 and of the iGEM 2008 teams which were withdrawn from the competition.
Also see [http://www.upedu.org/upedu/process/artifact/ar_rskls.htm UPEDU's description of the Risk List] artifact and the enclosing artifact, our project plan.
Risks
For each risk the following is documented:
- Identifier: a descriptive (short) name
- Magnitude: ranking from 1-10, 1 is low risk and 10 is a high risk. Taking in account: how probable and severe the problem is.
- Description: a brief description of the risk.
- Impact:
- C = critical, there is a real problem but when it is noticed in an early stage it can probably be solved, all the project members are affected.
- H = high impact, the probability of the projects success is seriously affected. There is an immediate need for a meeting with the stakeholders.
- M= medium impact, there is a real problem but when it is noticed in an early stage it can be solved, not all members are affected.
- L= low impact, if this risk can not be avoided, probably the team will decide to live with it.
- Indicators: when do we know this risk has materialized (or better yet, is about to materialize).
- Mitigation Strategy: how are we reducing the impact of this risk?
- Contingency Plan: what can we do if this risk does materialize?
[NEW! The first risk table (might need revising ;)]
Magnitude | Description | Impact | Mitigation Plan | Contingency Plan |
---|---|---|---|---|
6 | NoFunding. If we do not get any more funding we may not be able to cover our budget. This may mean that some things will not be possible. | C | Our budget should largely be covered before the summer.We already have some funds and are attempting to acquire more. | Send letters to (non)-governmental / university organisations and companies. |
7 | PR letters do not work out well | C | Letters contain information about: Synthetic Biology, the iGEM competition, contact information. | Try to find out what went wrong, call the organisations and companies. Ask a specialist to have a look at the sponsor letter. |
6 | [München] Probably had too low budget because they started only in June with looking for sponsoring | H | A budget plan has been made. Roles are divided, two people are working on letters/flyers/poster for sponsoring. | Ask instructors for help, start with fundraising already before a final project is chosen. |