Minnesota/29 June 2009
From 2009.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I switched over today to looking at making the "leakiness" equations for the TTN model. Initially I would represent the leakiness with two equations:<br> | I switched over today to looking at making the "leakiness" equations for the TTN model. Initially I would represent the leakiness with two equations:<br> | ||
+ | <center> | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center" border = "1" | {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center" border = "1" | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 17: | Line 18: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|47||RNAp + lacP + tetO1 + tetO2:tetR2 -> RNAp:lacP||1E+07 | |47||RNAp + lacP + tetO1 + tetO2:tetR2 -> RNAp:lacP||1E+07 | ||
- | |}<br> | + | |}</center><br> |
The aTc complexes don't have to be represented since the leakiness is for aTc=0 in particular. Also a third leakiness equation could be made, one where both tetO1:tetR2 and tetO2:tetR2 exist, but I chose to add this later if necessary. I expect the results tomorrow.<br> | The aTc complexes don't have to be represented since the leakiness is for aTc=0 in particular. Also a third leakiness equation could be made, one where both tetO1:tetR2 and tetO2:tetR2 exist, but I chose to add this later if necessary. I expect the results tomorrow.<br> |
Revision as of 22:17, 30 July 2009
Back to Notebook Home | |
Go to Previous Day (June 26) | Go to Next Day (June 30) |
Patrick
I switched over today to looking at making the "leakiness" equations for the TTN model. Initially I would represent the leakiness with two equations:
Rxn # | Reaction | Forward Kinetic Constant |
---|---|---|
46 | RNAp + lacP + tetO1:tetR2 + tetO2 -> RNAp:lacP | 1E+07 |
47 | RNAp + lacP + tetO1 + tetO2:tetR2 -> RNAp:lacP | 1E+07 |
The aTc complexes don't have to be represented since the leakiness is for aTc=0 in particular. Also a third leakiness equation could be made, one where both tetO1:tetR2 and tetO2:tetR2 exist, but I chose to add this later if necessary. I expect the results tomorrow.