Team:EPF-Lausanne/Human Project

The aim of this part of the project is to communicate the research of the EPFL iGEM team, in the context of synthetic biology. The major challenge of this project is to get over the gap between scientific researches and science communication. Indeed, we have observed that a lot of people are afraid of the word cloning, GMO, or biotechnology but without knowing exactly what it means. There seems to be a problem of communication between the scientists and the rest of the world, and we can see that in the votations. Our aim is not to convince that scientific research in Life Sciences is harmless, but we want to inform normal people to enable them to form their own opinion while knowing all the facts (and not only what's believed, but what is scientifically proven).

The first part of the project was to talk with people to understand what they think, what they fear and what they know about synthetic biology. Therefore we did a survey and when to some high schools to talk to young students. Then, we are tried to inform people on what we are doing, mainly by giving interviews and writing articles for some newspapers. We are also did some conferences and talks, to scientifics and to general public.

Human Practices explores how synthetic biology might inform safety, security, health, and ethics through the new constructs engeneered by synthetic biology. It also observes the repercussions on economy, politics, and culture resulting from adavances in synthetic biology.

A first part of our work was to share our research to general public, as to scientists. That's why the following section summarizes what we did.

Talks

We went to some high schools to do a presentation to high school students. We first gave them the survey to have their opinion, and then we did a short presentation about synthetic biology. The idea was to interact with some young people that are potentially interested in our field (they all had taken the physics-math or biology-chemistry specialisation), but without special knowledge about it. We wanted first of all to inform them about some fields of biology and gave them the example of our project. We listened to their feelings about cloning, biotechnology and genetic engineering. After our presentation, we gave them a little time so they could asked questions about what scientific research looks like etc.

We first had a contact with Ms Aminian, a chemistry high school teacher in Burier. We went to give them a talk on Friday 25th of September and on Wednesday 30th of September, in 4 different classes (so about 100 students). These students were about 14-16 years old, so they didn't have any special knowledge in the field.

We also had a contact in Valais, and we gave a talk there on 30th of September, to 40 students. These students were a bit older, mostly 20-21 years old, and they had already done 5 years of biology.

During our study trip in Singapour, we presented our iGEM project during a symposium at Singapour general hospital. Here is the presentation. The people attending the symposium were researcher of the hospital and our class (about 70 people).

We also went on a visit trip to the Merck Serono site in Corsier-sur-Fenil. There we did a small talk about our project, and then we visited the site and in particular their bioreactor.

A comic with nice illustration : See [http://www.nature.com/nature/comics/syntheticbiologycomic/index.html this page] for a funny comics.

Surveys

We did a survey on two aspects of ethics and biology :

- Association of the level of knowledge with the feelings towards synthetic biology

- Opinion of people on whether they think the human have the right to manipulate genes etc

Here is the [http://spreadsheets.google.com/embeddedform?key=tfRE0LnWAJbEowo3w7zwFMw Survey]

Media Work

We try to contact a great number of newspapers to speak of our project on one hand, and on synthetic biology on the other hand. The final aim was to inform people, so they can get over understanding better what is hidden behind the words "synthetic biology", "cloning", or "genetically engeneered" for example.

Below are listed the different newspapaers we were in touch with:

24H and La Tribune de Genève

An interview of one member of our team was published along with an article about our project in two broadly read papers of our region : 24 heures and La Tribune de Genève. Link to the article :

[http://archives.tdg.ch/TG/TG/-/article-2009-05-1289/bioingenierieconstruire-quelque-chose-d8217utile-et-de-nouveau-avec-les-elements-de-base-du Article]

[http://archives.24heures.ch/VQ/LAUSANNE/-/article-2009-05-1146/nathalie-brandenberg-21-ans-suisse--allemande-doit-decrocher-dans-les-semaines-a-venir-son Interview]

Flash

Article in the [http://actualites.epfl.ch/flash Flash], which is the internal newspapers of the EPFL :

Click here to read the entire Flash

Click here to read only our article, called "Bricolage biologique"

We tried to have new interviews, so the following newspapers were contacted:

• Le Matin Dimanche :

Redacteur en chef Michel Danthe : not now...

• Le Matin : Impossible

• Le Temps -----> replied: maybe he will follow us in Boston

Contact: Olivier Dessibourg

Journaliste scientifique

Chef de la rubrique "Société"&"Sciences

• Le Nouvelliste.ch

Rédaction Martigny → the member of our team were interviewed on 1st of October. Link to the article : ...?

• 20 Minutes

→ relancé

Communication

We contacted Ariane Vlerick at the EPFL (Coordinatrice Communication de SV) → we are now in contact with :

• the Mediacom Service of EPFL (Jérome Grosse and Frédéric Rauss) → will provide us a help in order to explain our projet in different media
• projet Portes Ouvertes (Alain Herzog)
• presentation in gymnases (Maya Fruehauf)

A high school student followed us during one week
→ here is a short article on his experience during this week