Categories :

Home Team Sponsors Parts Submitted to Registry Image Gallery Leave a Message!

Project :

Overview Sensitivity Tuner --- Characterisation --- Modelling Colour Generators --- Carotenoids (Orange/Red) --- Melanin (Brown) --- Violacein (Purple/Green) The Future Safety

Notebook :

Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Week 9 Week 10

Team Logistics :

Protocols Stock List Research Shared Links and Help

Week 2 - The Project

Monday

Finalized our project into a few objectives

• Pigment production

• Transform E. coli to produce pigment
• Hook up the pigmentation genes to inducible promoters

• Shutter mechanism

• build, test a shutter mechanism
• Hook up pigmentation genes under inducible promoters to the shutter mechanism

• Improve on previous iGEM projects

• arsenic sensor?
• bacterial photography?

• Modelling

• shutter mechanism
• Growth rate regulation

Goals for Wet Work

• Inducible pigment production integrated with a shutter mechanism
• Possibly attach the arsenic bio-sensor to our green/red pigment output

Tuesday

Proceedure to make competant cells started

• One colony of TOP10 E. coli added to 50ml of LB broth. Incubated overnight in the shaking incubator

Planned and prepared for transformation

• Media made up

• Two litres of 0.1 mM HEPES
• One litre of LB broth (for making competant cells)
• 100ml of 10% glycerol

• Ampicillin made up with water to make 8 x 1ml aliquots of 100mg/ml
• 15 LB agar and 100ug/ml Ampicillin plates made up

Dry work

Plan for tomorrow

• prepare trimethoprim stock solution
• make LB agar and trimethoprim plates as well as LB agar and copper + tyrosine plates
• Complete proceedure for making competant cells (transfer bacteria into big flask, wash with HEPES, and aliquot into glycerol)
• Attempt transformations by electroporation

• pPSX plasmid (violet)
• melA plasmid (brown)
• biobricks

Wednesday

competent cell procedure

• completed (see protocol page for details of the procedure). Competent cells stored in aliquots at -80 degrees.

planned and prepared for electroporation tomorrow

• made up 4 LB agar and 100ug/ml Ampicillin, 0.2ug/mL tyrosine (NOTE: protocol actually calls for 0.3ug/mL), 15 ug/mL CuSO4 plates
• plan to transform TOP10 competent bacteria with

• melanin plasmid, pTRCmelA plasmid --plate onto tyrosine/copper/ampicillin plate
• violacein plasmid,Plasmid pPSX-Vio+ -- plate onto trimethoprim plate
• orange biobrick, BBa_K152005 -- plate onto ampicillin plate
• promoter, R0011 -- plate onto ampicillin plate
• more?

• need to make trimethoprim stock solution 10mg/mL acetone, and plate at 50ug/mL

• tried to make the stock solution today, couldn't get the solid trimethoprim to dissolve in acetone

• need to work out exact volumes of plasmid to be added to the cell (concentrations written on the side of the bottles)

Thursday

Electroporation

• transformed Top10 competent cells, incubated the following plates:

• Top10 + pTRCmelA plasmid on tyrosine/copper/ampicillin plate
• Top10 + Plasmid pPSX-Vio+ on trimethoprim plate
• Top10 + BBa_K152005 on ampicillin plate
• Top 10 + R0011 on ampicillin plate
• 1:10 dilutions of each were also plated

• All plates were stored overnight in the 37 degree incubator

Making BioBricks

With the aim of making a brown-pigmented BioBrick, we looked at constructing primers to cut out the MelA gene from the plasmid, add the prefix and suffix, and remove the two forbidden restriction sites. This would then be pasted into one of the recommended vectors and could be submitted to the registry.

Input and Processing systems

We split into groups to plan and discuss the following possible ideas for input systems:

• Mike and Shuna = Amplifier
• Siming and Alan = Bistable switch
• Crispian and Megan = Population control and growth
• Viv = Coloured spores (idea discarded due to high levels of complexity involved in understanding, designing and working with the spore system)

Plans for Friday

Meeting at 10am to discuss ideas Meeting with faculty at 2.30pm to further discuss ideas and present work done so far

Wet work = colony PCR (to be explained by James) and observation of (hopefully!) coloured plates

Friday

Results of Wet Work

All transformations were completed sucessfully. Single cononies were observed on the 1/10 dilution plates and could easily be picked out for plasmid propagation procedure (to be started on Monday). However no colours were observed.

Reasons:

• Melanin plasmid = plasmid required the addition of IPTG
• pPSX plasmid (violet) = the pigment is on a low copy number plasmid

BioBrick Construction

Used ApE to examine the melanin plasmid:

This contains only two forbidden restriction sites within the actual gene. These could be removed by PCR.

Also looked at the vio operon:

As this contains a large number of the forbidden biobrick restriction sites, it would be impossible to prepare the biobrick using PCR alone. The operon would have to be synthesised with these sites removed to be feasible as a biobrick.

The other possible pigments are the orange biobrick system and the pseudomonas red/green pigment.

""Pigment Plans""

• Melanin

• chemistry of pigment production:

• troubleshoot pigment production
• Make our own plasmid stocks
• As above, make the pigment into a biobrick
• As detailed in PAPER, the melanin gene we have is actually a mutant, tyrosine oveproducing strain, blah
• Goal: Have it as a fall-back pigment

• Violacin

• troubleshoot pigment production
• make our own plasmid sticks
• As above, synthesize the operon with the biobrick prefix and suffix
• Use the synthesized operon as a template to PCR out the individual

Planning a Processing System

AMPLIFICATION

POPULATION CONTROL

BIOSWITCH

A basic bistable switch requires two inverters, and some way of making it change state.

Important papers on this concept in synthetic biology include:

"Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli" Gardner, Cantor & Collins 2000 http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v403/n6767/pdf/403339a0.pdf

This paper was followed up with a second, "Programmable cells: Interfacing natural and engineered gene networks", 2004 http://www.pnas.org/content/101/22/8414.figures-only

The authors showed in 2000 that a genetic toggle switch was possible. They investigated using different promoters, and found only some combinations to give bistability.

Many iGEM teams have attempted to recreate a bistable switch; none have so far fully succeeded! The most recent were Peking 2007 and Bologna 2008.

Peking 2007 designed a bistable circuit as part of their "push on, push off" device. They connected together two mutual inhibitors, and showed that this gave an agar spread that had red in places and green in others. This suggests that they made a bistable device. However, they did not progress to activation by external sources.

Bologna's iGEM project in 2008 was a bistable circuit, called "E.coli PROM". They performed extensive modelling of the device, but did not complete fabrication.

This leaves an iGEM team with a good opportunity. Building on Peking and Bologna, amongst others, a working, and inducible bistable could be made, an iGEM first.

However, we decided that given the large amount of work which we need to do on pigments, and the fact that a non-functioning bistable would not be novel, we would not progress further with this idea.

Weekend Work

RED

Looked at red pigment synthesis briefly as optional easy extra link to relevant paper - https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/f/ff/1128.pdf

Big up to Mike for doing the wiki