Team:Groningen/Project/Vesicle

From 2009.igem.org

Introduction

About 150 species of prokaryotes (well studied examples are cyanobacteria and halophilic archaea) in aquatic habitats have been shown to contain gas vesicles, which provide cells with bouyancy. Their function is to position the bacteria (in water) in order to get either the right amount of oxygen or the right amount of light. Gas vesicles are made exclusively of proteins and contain gas. When gas vesicles are present in a cell, the overall density of that cell is lowered and the cell becomes bouyant. We want to utilize this bouyancy for an application e.g separation of specific molecules or specific cells.

Gas vesicles are hollow proteinous organelles made of gvpA and gvpC (in cyanobacteria), are permeable to gases and fill by diffusion. They are impermeable to water because of its hydrophobic inside. GvpA is a small 70AA long protein which forms a linear crystalline array of ribs to form the cylindrical shell and conical ends. GvpC is usually on the outside of the gas vesicle to make it stronger and stabilizes the structure (see Figure 1).

In B. megaterium a gas vesicle gene-cluster was found, which contained 14 gvp genes (gas vescicle polycitonic genes) which were functionally expressed in E. coli by Ning Li and Maura Cannon (Li 1998). The best bouyant fenotype was found when gvpA, gvpP, gvpQ and ORF-1 were excluded (see Figure 2). It was suggested that gvpB on the gvp-cluster of B. megaterium is a homolog of gvpA.

Gas vesicles in iGEM

In iGEM 2007, Melbourne created a biobrick for gas vesicle formation. In iGEM 2008 Kyoto had the idea to lift the Titanic from the bottom of the sea with the help of bouyant bacteria.

Figure 1: Gas vesicle cluster ()

[http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Melbourne/Lab_GV_Notebook Melbourne iGEM 2007 team] constructed a bouyant E. coli and they also added a of the short version of the gvp-cluster (without gvpA,P,Q, ORF-1 and AraC). This BioBrick is available and included in the microtiter plate send by HQ to us, so we can use this. Melbourne changed the gvp-cluster by cleaning it from 3 EcoRI sites and 1 PstI site, this leaded to a accidental addition of a 10x repeat of "TCTGCAAATTA". They mention that they added the BioBrick prefix and suffix to the BioBrick, though the restriction sites of these additions cannot be found by CloneManager in the sequence available on the Partregistry. Hopefully, the part is available on a standard vector, which has the pre- and suffix for BioBricks. For cloning this part we can use the [http://parts.mit.edu/igem07/index.php/Melbourne/Lab_Notebook_gv_6 optimized protocol ] (restriction on part with XbaI and SpeI, on the vector with SpeI) for ligation of the gvp-cluster and a [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_J61035 vector BBa_J61035] (3539bp, copy nr??), this unluckily leads to ligation of the gvp-cluster in an unspecific direction. This can of course be tested by restriction, PCR or sequencing, but it takes more time as another step will be introduced. The vector has two selection markers: Ampicillin and Gentamycin.

Cloning strategy

figure 2: The floating device will be built up of an inducible promoter which can be induced by a certain intracellular concentration of metal-ions, and a gas vesicle cluster.

To create a floating device, we will use the biobrick gas vesicle cluster (GVP).We will try to improve this biobrick by removing the 11x repeat. The GVP cluster will be expressed under control of a metal sensitive promoter.

Alternative cloning strategy

Another possibility is to use e.g. XbaI and SpeI and also cut a vector with these enzymes, this would lead to ligation of the gvp-cluster in one direction. A possible vector for this strategy on the partsregistry is: [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_J23018 BBa_J23018] (2298 bp).

Modelling

Buoyancy

The gas vesicles are shaped roughly like a cylinder with a cone at each end, whose cross-section we model as (based mostly on Walsby 1994):

We assume the interior of the wall of the gas vesicle is similarly shaped to the exterior, just slightly smaller (the right-most part of the image above illustrates this situation for the left tip of the gas vesicle). This means the different dimensions are related through the equations below. To determine the total volume, just use them with the given width/diameter (at least for the dimensions given in Walsby 1994). To determine the gas volume, use them with w_gas and d_gas.

w = total width
tw = thickness of wall (1.8-1.95nm)
d = diameter
a = 77 degrees
ρgas = density of gas in vesicle (kg/m^3 = yg/nm^3)
ρwall = density of vesicle wall (kg/m^3)
wwt = tw/sin(a/2)
wt = (1/2)*d/tan(a/2)
wc = w - 2*wt
Vc = (1/4)*pi*d^2*wc
Vt = (1/12)*pi*d^2*wt
V = Vc+2*Vt
M = ρ*V

wgas = w-2*wwt = width of gas space
dgas = d-2*tw = diameter of gas space
V = Vgas + Vwall

Now we can consider the buoyant density of E. coli with gas vesicles. We have chosen to approach this problem using densities and volume ratios. According to Baldwin 1995, Bylund 1991 and Poole 1977, the density of (wild-type) E. coli is 1100 kg/m³ ±3% under wildly varying conditions. This makes our method easier than trying to directly compute the density of a single cell, due to the fact that the volume can differ wildly (both during the life cycle and from strain to strain) and a lack of concrete data on the number of gas vesicles produced (in E. coli). Note that the computations below assume that the gas vesicles simply add to the existing structures.

Vc = volume of a cell without gas vesicles
Vv = volume of gas vesicles in cell
Vcv = volume of a cell with gas vesicles (assumed to be Vc+Vv)
ρc = density of a cell without gas vesicles
ρv = density of gas vesicles
ρm = density of medium

The following has to be true if the cell floats:
 Vc*ρc + Vv*ρv < Vcv*ρm
 (Vcv-Vv)*ρc + Vv*ρv < Vcv*ρm
 ρc + (Vv/Vcv)*(ρv-ρc) < ρm
Assume (ρv - ρc)<0
 Vv/Vcv > (ρm - ρc)/(ρv - ρc)
 Vv/Vcv > 1 - (ρm - ρv)/(ρc - ρv)

Missing information

• Used promotor for expression of the gvp-cluster:
  • Inducible (may be used for proof-of-principle)
  • Constitutive (may be used for proof-of-principle)
  • Metal sensitive
• What kind of vector was used by Li and Cannon (1995) or Melbourne (2007)? Is there a negative effect of high copy number?
• What is the maximum amount of pressure gas vesicles can handle? At which depth would this be, how can one put this kind of pressure on a water column?
• What is the density of gas vesicles in cells (normally or in case of over-expression)
• Modelling parameters (to be measured):
  • What is the density of the cell without gas vesicles/metal (largely known, but would be good to check), and how is this affected by letting the cell make gas vesicles and/or metal transporters/accumulators and so on?
  • How many gas vesicles are produced? (As volume percentage?)
  • (How fast are they produced?)

-Cyanobacteria Bowen 1965: gas vacuoles made up of gas vesicles (75 nm in diameter and up to 1.0 ,um in length, single wall layer only 2 nm thick) 0,7MPa gives irreversible loss of buoyancy fenotype, but found in next generation.

you can use a nephelometer, to measurement the light scattering of the gas vesicles (Walsby 1994)

Planning and requirements:

• Modelling:
  • Buoyancy
    • Permeability
    • Number of gasvesicles
    • Where do the gasvesciles end, in hight.
  • Mass of the bacteria (E. coli)
  • How long it takes before it floates
    • How long it take untill it is being expressed
    • How long it will take untill there are enough gasvesicles
    • How does it stay floating
• Lab:
  • Gvp
    • Cluster of biobricks
    • Vector ordered from article
    • First expression with constutatieve promotor, later with metal sensitive promotor
  • Measurements
    • Where are the bacteria, what are bac concentrations on a certain hight (not necessary???)
      • Making pictures on certain hight and compare with picture of known concentration
    • Do we have gas vesicles?
      • Measurement vesicle volume using a nephelometer (Holland 2009,Walsby 1994)
      • Measurement of cell density by centrifuging in density (Percoll) gradients Walsby1994
      • Measurement the volume of gass using a compression tube (Walsby 1979, Walsby 1994)