Team:EPF-Lausanne/Results/EDS

From 2009.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 35: Line 35:
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/thumb/5/53/Light_nb.jpg/150px-Light_nb.jpg" name="MyImage3"></a>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/thumb/5/53/Light_nb.jpg/150px-Light_nb.jpg" name="MyImage3"></a>
-
</html>
+
</center></html>
<br><br>
<br><br>
----
----

Revision as of 10:52, 20 October 2009






                                   




Dark State simulation

We run an equilibration of 80ns using 32 processors on the dark state (2v0u). It took a month of computation to have this result.

Here is a movie over the trajectory file.




Validation of dark state simulation

Here we look at the output to check input parameters.

Evolution of Pression, Volume and Temperature

The raw data for the equilibration match what we set for the NPT. Pressure and temperature are kept constant using namd dynamic. The volume is quite constant as well.

2v0ueq.jpg

RMSD

Then we computed the evolution of the rmsd compared to the first timestep of equilibration. We see that there is a plateau after ~40ns, which means that our system's energy is reaching a minimum. That's clearly what we expected.

2v0u rmsd.jpg

RMSF

The comparison of the RMSF to the beta factor measured during crystallography of all alpha carbons over the simulation is a nice validation of our simulation. We get quite similar curves, with some differences at one end of the protein. We see in the movie that this part moves a lot.
Here we computed the oscillation of RMSF in function of residue number, and we highlight the interesting part of our protein, namely the beta sheet and the alpha helix.

2v0u rmsf.jpg




Analysis of the simulation

We have organized our analysis on 2 main ideas:

  • Find a structural change in the Jα helix based on the simulation using namd.
  • Find residues showing different comportment in dark and light state

Angle between beta sheet and alpha helix

First, we start by looking at the angle between the beta sheet and the Jα helix.

         Click here to see the code used in VMD to get angle data

We get a quite constant value. It will be more interesting to compare this graph to the light state.

2v0u angoli.jpg

GLN513 - ASN414 - FMN

The Jα helix is stabilized by h-bonds to the beta sheet. These bonds are supposed to be disrupted by the conformational change in the dark state. The residues 513 seems to be involved in stabilisation of FMN through hydrogen bonds. We hope it is linked to beta sheet, more precisely the residue 414. There is a picture of the situation, residue ASN 414 is on the left (beta sheet), GLN513 in the middle and the FMN is in red. All the hydrogen bonds we investigated over the simulation are pictured.

2v0u 414 513 FMN.jpg

Here is a plot of the distance between the 2 hydrogens from sidechain of GLN513 to the oxygen of FMN. HE22 is definitely involved in an hydrogen bond, but doesn't move enough to loose the interaction.

2v0u dist 513 FMN.jpg

We can have a look at the distance between O of sidechain of ASN 414 to Hs of GLN513.

2v0u dist 513 414.jpg

Maybe the sidechains of GLN513 moves in regard the the position of ASN414? -> no, there is a single combination on the next graph.

2v0u dihed 414 513.jpg

CYS450 - FMN

An interesting residue to study in the dark state is the residue n° 450, which is the cystein that reacts with the cofactor. Let's start with a picture of the situation, where you can see the distance between CYS450 and FMN:

C450-C4A bond.jpg


Here we plot the distance between the sulfur atom of the cystein and the FMN carbon which is attacked by the sulfur atom upon light activation:

Distance SG-C4A.jpg

Here we can see that the sulfur atom is 70% of the time in the OUT conformation (dosen't point toward the cofactor, FMN). In the plot, it is translated by the fact that the sulfur atom is far from the C4A carbon of the FMN (the one which is attacked by the sulfur atom upon light activation).

The sulfur atom is 30 % of the time in the IN conformation (point toward the cofactor, FMN). In the plot, it is translated by the fact that the sulfur atom is near the C4A carbon of the FMN.


IN conformation

Conf IN.jpg


OUT conformation

Conf OUT.jpg

Here is the plot of the dihedral angle of this residue to see how many time the cystein point toward the FMN:

Csy diherdral dark.jpg

This plot show exactly the same conformational ratio (70% OUT 30% IN) than the distance plot.

Some useful distances

The Jα helix is anchored to the β structure by two H-bond networks the first involving Lys533 (Jα) and the couple Glu475, Gln497 (β structure), the second involving Lys413 (Jα) and Thr535 (β structure). Here we plot the H-bond distances (two in the former and one in the latter).

  • Bond between Gln497 and Lys533 in dark state

bond1


  • Bond between Gln475 and Lys533 in dark state

bond2