Team:Paris/Ethics ethicalreport

From 2009.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
m (The Paris team ethical and sociological report)
m (The Paris team ethical and sociological report)
Line 16: Line 16:
The full report can be downloaded as pdf document here.
The full report can be downloaded as pdf document here.
-
* [[Team:Paris/EthicsReportPreface| Preface: Why wonder about ethics in a biological engineering competition?]]
+
*[[Team:Paris/EthicsReportPreface| Preface]]
* Methods
* Methods
* Introduction
* Introduction

Revision as of 19:29, 19 October 2009

iGEM > Paris > Ethic > Ethical Report > Main

Ethical Report

Main - Preface - Methods - Introduction

The Paris team ethical and sociological report

The full report can be downloaded as pdf document here.

  • Preface
  • Methods
  • Introduction
    • A.Perspectives from the field of ethics : polyphony and the moral imperative.
    • B.Perspectives from the scientific field : considering the social world.
  • I.Biosafety and biosecurity concerns
    • A. Biosafety
    • B. Biosecurity
  • II. Naturality and Artificiality.
    • A. From “what” do we have to protect nature?
    • B. Performing Lexicon : The playing God issue?
    • C. A false question? ...
    • D. … An ironical answer
    • E. What “real question”? : Practices and alienability of the living.
    • F. Conclusion
  • III. Practices
    • A. What form for what life science?
    • B. Self or Exploded governance?
    • C. Forms of critics
    • D. To finish with... A case study
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
  • Appendices : Reports of the collective discussion in the team : Real time ethical reflexion.


    • Preface : Why wonder about ethics in a biological engineering competition?