"
EPF-Lausanne/8 October 2009
From 2009.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(→Wet Lab) |
|||
| (6 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
==Wet Lab== | ==Wet Lab== | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | + | Since the Trp-mutated strains which contained only one plasmid still managed to grow in our media even though there was a double antibiotic selection, we wondered whether they contained an antibiotic resistance which we didn't know of. To verifiy this, we put all three strains in culture either in LB+ampicilin or in LB+kanamycin. In theory only one of the strains (JW 4356-2) should grow, in the medium with kanamycin. The other 2 strains (JRG 465 and LRG 1046) shouldn't be able to grow at all. We will check tomorrow morning. | |
| - | + | ||
==People in the lab== | ==People in the lab== | ||
| - | |||
| + | Basile, Tu, Gab | ||
<html><center><a href="https://2009.igem.org/EPF-Lausanne/7_October_2009"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/thumb/6/61/Flèche_gauche.png/70px-Flèche_gauche.png"></a> | <html><center><a href="https://2009.igem.org/EPF-Lausanne/7_October_2009"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/thumb/6/61/Flèche_gauche.png/70px-Flèche_gauche.png"></a> | ||
Latest revision as of 10:12, 10 October 2009
Contents |
Wet Lab
Since the Trp-mutated strains which contained only one plasmid still managed to grow in our media even though there was a double antibiotic selection, we wondered whether they contained an antibiotic resistance which we didn't know of. To verifiy this, we put all three strains in culture either in LB+ampicilin or in LB+kanamycin. In theory only one of the strains (JW 4356-2) should grow, in the medium with kanamycin. The other 2 strains (JRG 465 and LRG 1046) shouldn't be able to grow at all. We will check tomorrow morning.
People in the lab
Basile, Tu, Gab
