Team:Paris/Ethics ethicalreport

From 2009.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Main - Methodology : Real time ethical reflexion)
Line 70: Line 70:
</div>
</div>
<div id="right-side"></div>
<div id="right-side"></div>
 +
</html>
 +
 +
<html>
 +
</div>
 +
<div id="paris_content_boxtop">
 +
</div>
 +
<div id="paris_content">
</html>
</html>

Revision as of 19:51, 19 October 2009

iGEM > Paris > Ethic > Ethical LabBook > Main


Main - Methodology : Real time ethical reflexion

The Paris team ethical and sociological report

The full report can be downloaded as pdf document here.

  • Preface
  • Methods
  • Introduction
    • A.Perspectives from the field of ethics : polyphony and the moral imperative.
    • B.Perspectives from the scientific field : considering the social world.
  • I.Biosafety and biosecurity concerns
    • A. Biosafety
    • B. Biosecurity
  • II. Naturality and Artificiality.
    • A. From “what” do we have to protect nature?
    • B. Performing Lexicon : The playing God issue?
    • C. A false question? ...
    • D. … An ironical answer
    • E. What “real question”? : Practices and alienability of the living.
    • F. Conclusion
  • III. Practices
    • A. What form for what life science?
    • B. Self or Exploded governance?
    • C. Forms of critics
    • D. To finish with... A case study
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
  • Appendices : Reports of the collective discussion in the team : Real time ethical reflexion.


    • Preface : Why wonder about ethics in a biological engineering competition?