Team:Paris/Ethics ethicalreport

From 2009.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Main - Methodology : Real time ethical reflexion)
m (The Paris team ethical and sociological report)
Line 81: Line 81:
== The Paris team ethical and sociological report ==
== The Paris team ethical and sociological report ==
-
The full report can be downloaded as pdf document here.
+
The full report can be downloaded as [[https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/b/b2/TeamParis-SynthEthics.pdf pdf document here]].
*[[Team:Paris/EthicsReportPreface| Preface]]
*[[Team:Paris/EthicsReportPreface| Preface]]
-
* Methods
+
*[[Team:Paris/EthicsReportMethods| Methods]]
* Introduction
* Introduction
** A.Perspectives from the field of ethics : polyphony and the moral imperative.
** A.Perspectives from the field of ethics : polyphony and the moral imperative.

Revision as of 21:55, 19 October 2009

iGEM > Paris > Ethic > Ethical LabBook > Main


The Paris team ethical and sociological report

The full report can be downloaded as [pdf document here].

  • Preface
  • Methods
  • Introduction
    • A.Perspectives from the field of ethics : polyphony and the moral imperative.
    • B.Perspectives from the scientific field : considering the social world.
  • I.Biosafety and biosecurity concerns
    • A. Biosafety
    • B. Biosecurity
  • II. Naturality and Artificiality.
    • A. From “what” do we have to protect nature?
    • B. Performing Lexicon : The playing God issue?
    • C. A false question? ...
    • D. … An ironical answer
    • E. What “real question”? : Practices and alienability of the living.
    • F. Conclusion
  • III. Practices
    • A. What form for what life science?
    • B. Self or Exploded governance?
    • C. Forms of critics
    • D. To finish with... A case study
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
  • Appendices : Reports of the collective discussion in the team : Real time ethical reflexion.


    • Preface : Why wonder about ethics in a biological engineering competition?