"
Team:Paris/Ethics ethicalreport
From 2009.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
m (→The Paris team ethical and sociological report) |
(→The Paris team ethical and sociological report) |
||
| Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
The full report can be downloaded as [[https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/b/b2/TeamParis-SynthEthics.pdf pdf document here]]. | The full report can be downloaded as [[https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/b/b2/TeamParis-SynthEthics.pdf pdf document here]]. | ||
| - | *[[Team:Paris/ | + | *[[Team:Paris/EthicalReportPreface| Preface]] |
| - | *[[Team:Paris/ | + | *[[Team:Paris/EthicalReportMethods| Methods]] |
| - | *[[Team:Paris/ | + | *[[Team:Paris/EthicalReportIntroduction| Introduction]] |
** A.Perspectives from the field of ethics : polyphony and the moral imperative. | ** A.Perspectives from the field of ethics : polyphony and the moral imperative. | ||
** B.Perspectives from the scientific field : considering the social world. | ** B.Perspectives from the scientific field : considering the social world. | ||
| - | *[[Team:Paris/ | + | *[[Team:Paris/EthicalReportBiosafetyBiosecurity| I.Biosafety and biosecurity concerns]] |
** A. Biosafety | ** A. Biosafety | ||
** B. Biosecurity | ** B. Biosecurity | ||
| - | *[[Team:Paris/ | + | *[[Team:Paris/EthicalReportNaturalityArtificiality| II. Naturality and Artificiality.]] |
** A. From “what” do we have to protect nature? | ** A. From “what” do we have to protect nature? | ||
** B. Performing Lexicon : The playing God issue? | ** B. Performing Lexicon : The playing God issue? | ||
| Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
** E. What “real question”? : Practices and alienability of the living. | ** E. What “real question”? : Practices and alienability of the living. | ||
** F. Conclusion | ** F. Conclusion | ||
| - | *[[Team:Paris/ | + | *[[Team:Paris/EthicalReportPractices| III. Practices]] |
** A. What form for what life science? | ** A. What form for what life science? | ||
** B. Self or Exploded governance? | ** B. Self or Exploded governance? | ||
** C. Forms of critics | ** C. Forms of critics | ||
** D. To finish with... A case study | ** D. To finish with... A case study | ||
| - | *[[Team:Paris/ | + | *[[Team:Paris/EthicalReportConclusion| Conclusion]] |
| - | *[[Team:Paris/ | + | *[[Team:Paris/EthicalReportAcknowledgements| Acknowledgements]] |
| - | *[[Team:Paris/ | + | *[[Team:Paris/EthicalReportReferences| References]] |
| - | *[[Team:Paris/ | + | *[[Team:Paris/EthicalReportAppendices| Appendices: Reports of the collective discussion in the team : Real time ethical reflexion.]] |
Revision as of 22:02, 19 October 2009
iGEM > Paris > Ethic > Ethical LabBook > Main
The Paris team ethical and sociological report
The full report can be downloaded as [pdf document here].
- Preface
- Methods
- Introduction
- A.Perspectives from the field of ethics : polyphony and the moral imperative.
- B.Perspectives from the scientific field : considering the social world.
- I.Biosafety and biosecurity concerns
- A. Biosafety
- B. Biosecurity
- II. Naturality and Artificiality.
- A. From “what” do we have to protect nature?
- B. Performing Lexicon : The playing God issue?
- C. A false question? ...
- D. … An ironical answer
- E. What “real question”? : Practices and alienability of the living.
- F. Conclusion
- III. Practices
- A. What form for what life science?
- B. Self or Exploded governance?
- C. Forms of critics
- D. To finish with... A case study
- Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- References
- Appendices: Reports of the collective discussion in the team : Real time ethical reflexion.
