|
|
(99 intermediate revisions not shown) |
Line 11: |
Line 11: |
| </html> | | </html> |
| | | |
- | <table width="100%"> | + | <table width="100%" border="0"> |
| <tr> | | <tr> |
- | <td valign="top" width= "23%" rowspan="2"> | + | <td valign="top" width= "19%" rowspan="2"> |
| {{UNIPV-Pavia/Menu}} | | {{UNIPV-Pavia/Menu}} |
| </td> | | </td> |
Line 28: |
Line 28: |
| Here we describe the characterization results of 4 parts of our own design, 2 existing parts re-built because they were inconsistent and 7 existing parts taken from the Registry. When not reported differently, all the experiments have been performed according to [[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Parts_Characterization#Growth conditions| Growth conditions]] and [[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Parts_Characterization#Data analysis| Data analysis]] sections. | | Here we describe the characterization results of 4 parts of our own design, 2 existing parts re-built because they were inconsistent and 7 existing parts taken from the Registry. When not reported differently, all the experiments have been performed according to [[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Parts_Characterization#Growth conditions| Growth conditions]] and [[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Parts_Characterization#Data analysis| Data analysis]] sections. |
| | | |
- | [[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Parts_Characterization#Our new parts| '''Our new parts''':]] | + | [[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/New_Parts| '''Our new parts''':]] |
- | *[[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Parts_Characterization#BBa_K173003 - ethanol producing device| BBa_K173003 - ethanol producing device]] | + | *[[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/New_Parts#BBa_K173003 - ethanol producing device| BBa_K173003 - ethanol producing device]] |
- | *[[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Parts_Characterization#BBa_K173007 - aTc inducible device with J23100 promoter| BBa_K173007 - aTc inducible device with J23100 promoter]] | + | *[[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/New_Parts#BBa_K173007 - aTc inducible device with J23100 promoter| BBa_K173007 - aTc inducible device with J23100 promoter]] |
- | *[[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Parts_Characterization#BBa_K173011 - aTc inducible device with J23118 promoter| BBa_K173011 - aTc inducible device with J23118 promoter]] | + | *[[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/New_Parts#BBa_K173011 - aTc inducible device with J23118 promoter| BBa_K173011 - aTc inducible device with J23118 promoter]] |
- | *[[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Parts_Characterization#BBa_K173010 - lactose/IPTG inducible device with J23118 promoter| BBa_K173010 - lactose/IPTG inducible device with J23118 promoter]] | + | *[[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/New_Parts#BBa_K173010 - lactose/IPTG inducible device with J23118 promoter| BBa_K173010 - lactose/IPTG inducible device with J23118 promoter]] |
| | | |
- | [[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Parts_Characterization#Re-built existing parts| '''Re-built existing parts (BBa_our part code/BBa_existing part code)''':]] | + | [[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Rebuilt| '''Re-built existing parts (BBa_our part code/BBa_existing part code)''':]] |
- | *[[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Parts_Characterization#BBa_K173004/BBa_I732019 - beta-galactosidase protein generator| BBa_K173004/BBa_I732019 - beta-galactosidase protein generator]] | + | *[[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Rebuilt#BBa_K173004/BBa_I732019 - beta-galactosidase protein generator| BBa_K173004/BBa_I732019 - beta-galactosidase protein generator]] |
- | *[[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Parts_Characterization#BBa_K173005/BBa_Q04400 - tetR QPI| BBa_K173005/BBa_Q04400 - tetR QPI]] | + | *[[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Rebuilt#BBa_K173005/BBa_Q04400 - tetR QPI| BBa_K173005/BBa_Q04400 - tetR QPI]] |
| | | |
- | [[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Parts_Characterization#Existing parts from the Registry| '''Existing parts from the Registry''':]] | + | [[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Existing| '''Existing parts from the Registry''':]] |
- | *[[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Parts_Characterization#BBa_J23100, BBa_J23101, BBa_J23118 - constitutive promoter family members| BBa_J23100, BBa_J23101, BBa_J23118 - constitutive promoter family members]] | + | *[[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Existing#BBa_J23100, BBa_J23101, BBa_J23118 - constitutive promoter family members| BBa_J23100, BBa_J23101, BBa_J23118 - constitutive promoter family members]] |
- | *[[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Parts_Characterization#BBa_F2620 - 3OC6HSL receiver device| BBa_F2620 - 3OC6HSL receiver device]] | + | *[[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Existing#BBa_F2620 - 3OC6HSL receiver device| BBa_F2620 - 3OC6HSL receiver device]] |
- | *[[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Parts_Characterization#BBa_K116001 - nhaA promoter| BBa_K116001 - nhaA promoter]] | + | *[[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Existing#BBa_K116001 - nhaA promoter| BBa_K116001 - nhaA promoter]] |
- | *[[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Parts_Characterization#BBa_K112808 - enterobacteria phage T4 Lysis Device| BBa_K112808 - Enterobacteria phage T4 Lysis Device]] | + | *[[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Existing#BBa_K112808 - Enterobacteria phage T4 Lysis Device| BBa_K112808 - Enterobacteria phage T4 Lysis Device]] |
- | *[[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Parts_Characterization#BBa_R0011 - Plac hybrid promoter| BBa_R0011 - Plac hybrid promoter]] | + | *[[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Existing#BBa_R0011 - Plac hybrid promoter| BBa_R0011 - Plac hybrid promoter]] |
| | | |
| + | [[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Debug| '''Existing parts - sequence debugging''':]] |
| + | *[[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Debug#BBa_T9002| BBa_T9002]] - [[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Debug#BBa_K131009| BBa_K131009]] - [[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Debug#BBa_K131010| BBa_K131010]] - [[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Debug#BBa_K116001| BBa_K116001]] - [[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Debug#BBa_K116002| BBa_K116002]] - [[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Debug#BBa_P0412| BBa_P0412]] - [[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Debug#BBa_K112405| BBa_K112405]] - [[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Debug#BBa_K101017| BBa_K101017]] - [[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Debug#BBa_I746902| BBa_I746902]] - [[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Debug#BBa_I746903| BBa_I746903]] - [[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Debug#BBa_K112808| BBa_K112808]] - [[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Debug#BBa_F2620| BBa_F2620]] |
| | | |
| __NOTOC__ | | __NOTOC__ |
- |
| |
- | = '''Our new parts''' =
| |
- |
| |
- | ==BBa_K173003 - ethanol producing device==
| |
- | ===Description===
| |
- | This device takes PoPS as input and produces pyruvate decarboxylase (pdc) and alcohol dehydrogenase II (adhB) enzymes.
| |
- |
| |
- | Pyruvate decarboxylase (pdc, <partinfo>BBa_K173016</partinfo>) catalyses the decarboxylation of pyruvic acid to acetaldehyde and carbon dioxide, while alcohol dehydrogenase II (adhB, <partinfo>BBa_K173017</partinfo>) catalyses the acetaldehyde reduction to ethanol. The latter enzyme, as reported in literature, is also able to work in the opposite direction, oxidizing ethanol to acetaldehyde. The two enzymes come from Zymomonas mobilis ethanologenic bacterium and constitute an essential step of alcoholic fermentation.
| |
- |
| |
- | So, this device contains the minimum set of genes that are required to engineer a heterologous fermentation pathway.
| |
- |
| |
- | The coding sequences of pdc and adhB genes have been optimized for Escherichia coli codon usage.
| |
- |
| |
- | [[Image:Pv_A5new2_3_BBa_K173003.png]]
| |
- |
| |
- | ===Characterization===
| |
- | '''Qualitative phenotype characterization'''
| |
- |
| |
- | ''PLATES RESULTS''
| |
- |
| |
- | This device has been cloned downstream of 4 different promoters, one of which in two different vectors. These assemblies were transformed in TOP10 and gave the following phenotypes on LB agar plates and also on LB agar plates + 2% glucose (all the plates have been incubated at 37°C for about 11 hours, then some colonies were picked with a sterile tip and plates were incubated for additional 10 hours):
| |
- | {|align="center" border=1
| |
- | |'''promoter upstream of <partinfo>BBa_K173003</partinfo>'''
| |
- | |'''plasmid'''
| |
- | |'''promoter RPU in LB'''
| |
- | |'''colony phenotype'''
| |
- | |-
| |
- | |<partinfo>BBa_K173005</partinfo>
| |
- | |<partinfo>pSB1AK3</partinfo>
| |
- | |?
| |
- | |small colonies
| |
- | |-
| |
- | |<partinfo>BBa_J23116</partinfo>
| |
- | |<partinfo>pSB1A2</partinfo>
| |
- | |not estimated
| |
- | |small colonies
| |
- | |-
| |
- | |<partinfo>BBa_J23118</partinfo>
| |
- | |<partinfo>pSB1A2</partinfo>
| |
- | |?
| |
- | |small colonies
| |
- | |-
| |
- | |<partinfo>BBa_F2620</partinfo>
| |
- | |<partinfo>pSB1AK3</partinfo>
| |
- | |? without induction
| |
- | |normal size colonies
| |
- | |-
| |
- | |<partinfo>BBa_F2620</partinfo>
| |
- | |<partinfo>pSB4C5</partinfo>
| |
- | |not estimated
| |
- | |normal size colonies
| |
- | |}
| |
- |
| |
- | These results demonstrate that a constitutive expression of pdc and adhB gives a high metabolic burden to E. coli, in fact the only normal phenotype on plates was <partinfo>BBa_K173003</partinfo> with <partinfo>BBa_F2620</partinfo> non-induced device. This assembled part has been submitted to the Registry as <partinfo>BBa_K173021</partinfo>.
| |
- |
| |
- | {|align="center"
| |
- | |[[Image:pv_colony_size_B9.jpg|thumb|BBa_F2620-BBa_K173003 in pSB1AK3 plate: example of normal size colonies.]]
| |
- | |[[Image:pv_colony_size_B7.jpg|thumb|BBa_K173005-BBa_K173003 in pSB1AK3 plate: example of small size colonies.]]
| |
- | |}
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | ''LIQUID CULTURES RESULTS''
| |
- |
| |
- | Grown cultures of <partinfo>BBa_K173003</partinfo> and <partinfo>BBa_K173021</partinfo> after the FIRST INOCULUM showed different phenotypes (qualitative analysis), as a function of the used protocol.
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | [[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Parts_Characterization#PROTOCOL#1| PROTOCOL#1]] RESULTS (i.e. shaken anaerobic falcon tubes, no glucose):
| |
- | {|align="center" border=1
| |
- | |'''BioBrick'''
| |
- | |'''plasmid'''
| |
- | |'''induction<br>with 3OC6-HSL'''
| |
- | |'''phenotype'''
| |
- | |-
| |
- | |<partinfo>BBa_K173021</partinfo>
| |
- | |pSB1AK3
| |
- | |no
| |
- | |normal growth
| |
- | |-
| |
- | |<partinfo>BBa_K173003</partinfo>
| |
- | |pSB1AK3
| |
- | |no
| |
- | |normal growth
| |
- | |-
| |
- | |<partinfo>BBa_K173021</partinfo>
| |
- | |pSB4C5
| |
- | |no
| |
- | |normal growth
| |
- | |-
| |
- | |BBa_F2620 ALONE<br>- negative control
| |
- | |pSB1A2
| |
- | |no
| |
- | |normal growth
| |
- | |}
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | [[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Parts_Characterization#PROTOCOL#2| PROTOCOL#2]] RESULTS (i.e. unshaken anaerobic falcon tubes, 2% glucose):
| |
- | {|align="center" border=1
| |
- | |'''BioBrick'''
| |
- | |'''plasmid'''
| |
- | |'''induction<br>with 3OC6-HSL'''
| |
- | |'''phenotype'''
| |
- | |-
| |
- | |<partinfo>BBa_K173021</partinfo>
| |
- | |pSB1AK3
| |
- | |no
| |
- | |a lot of foam in the upper side of the culture;<br>a strangely big and cloudy pellet after 4000 rpm centrifugation.
| |
- | |-
| |
- | |<partinfo>BBa_K173021</partinfo>
| |
- | |pSB1AK3
| |
- | |100 nM
| |
- | |no growth
| |
- | |-
| |
- | |<partinfo>BBa_K173021</partinfo>
| |
- | |pSB1AK3
| |
- | |1 uM
| |
- | |no growth
| |
- | |-
| |
- | |BBa_F2620 ALONE<br>- negative control
| |
- | |pSB1A2
| |
- | |no
| |
- | |normal growth
| |
- | |-
| |
- | |BBa_F2620 ALONE<br>- negative control
| |
- | |pSB1A2
| |
- | |100 nM
| |
- | |normal growth
| |
- | |-
| |
- | |BBa_F2620 ALONE<br>- negative control
| |
- | |pSB1A2
| |
- | |1 uM
| |
- | |normal growth
| |
- | |-
| |
- | |<partinfo>BBa_K173003</partinfo>
| |
- | |pSB1AK3
| |
- | |no
| |
- | |normal growth
| |
- | |}
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | [[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Parts_Characterization#PROTOCOL#3| PROTOCOL#3]] RESULTS (i.e. shaken anaerobic falcon tubes, 2% glucose):
| |
- | {|align="center" border=1
| |
- | |'''BioBrick'''
| |
- | |'''plasmid'''
| |
- | |'''induction<br>with 3OC6-HSL'''
| |
- | |'''phenotype'''
| |
- | |-
| |
- | |<partinfo>BBa_K173021</partinfo>
| |
- | |pSB1AK3
| |
- | |no
| |
- | |higher amount of bacterial pellet than in the negative control (BBa_F2620)<br>after 4000 rpm centrifugation
| |
- | |-
| |
- | |<partinfo>BBa_K173021</partinfo>
| |
- | |pSB1AK3
| |
- | |100 nM
| |
- | |no growth
| |
- | |-
| |
- | |<partinfo>BBa_K173021</partinfo>
| |
- | |pSB1AK3
| |
- | |1 uM
| |
- | |no growth
| |
- | |-
| |
- | |<partinfo>BBa_K173021</partinfo>
| |
- | |pSB4C5
| |
- | |no
| |
- | |a bit higher amount of bacterial pellet than in the negative control (BBa_F2620),<br>but lower than in pSB1AK3 after 4000 rpm centrifugation
| |
- | |-
| |
- | |<partinfo>BBa_K173021</partinfo>
| |
- | |pSB4C5
| |
- | |1 uM
| |
- | |a bit higher amount of bacterial pellet than in the negative control (BBa_F2620),<br>but lower than in pSB1AK3 after 4000 rpm after 4000 rpm centrifugationcentrifugation
| |
- | |-
| |
- | |BBa_F2620 ALONE<br>- negative control
| |
- | |pSB1A2
| |
- | |no
| |
- | |normal growth
| |
- | |-
| |
- | |BBa_F2620 ALONE<br>- negative control
| |
- | |pSB1A2
| |
- | |100 nM
| |
- | |normal growth
| |
- | |-
| |
- | |BBa_F2620 ALONE<br>- negative control
| |
- | |pSB1A2
| |
- | |1 uM
| |
- | |normal growth
| |
- | |-
| |
- | |<partinfo>BBa_K173003</partinfo>
| |
- | |pSB1AK3
| |
- | |no
| |
- | |normal growth
| |
- | |}
| |
- |
| |
- | These results confirm the metabolic burden given by this BioBrick when gene expression is triggered: induced strains bearing a high copy plasmid containing <partinfo>BBa_K173021</partinfo> do not survive, while low copy ones can survive even at high induction (1 uM). We decided to exploit the lux promoter leakage activity for <partinfo>BBa_K173021</partinfo> in pSB1AK3 (high copy), while we decided to induce <partinfo>BBa_K173021</partinfo> in pSB4C5 (low copy) the with 1 uM of 3OC6-HSL during our fermentation experiments.
| |
- |
| |
- | The qualitative phenotypes of the grown cultures of <partinfo>BBa_K173003</partinfo> and <partinfo>BBa_K173021</partinfo> after fermentation in 10% glucose showed that pellets were higher in <partinfo>BBa_K173021</partinfo> (in both pSB1AK3 uninduced and pSB4C5 induced) than in <partinfo>BBa_K173003</partinfo> and in the negative control <partinfo>BBa_F2620</partinfo>.
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | Moreover, after both inoculum steps, the grown cultures of <partinfo>BBa_K173003</partinfo> and <partinfo>BBa_K173021</partinfo> (in both pSB1AK3 uninduced and pSB4C5 induced) showed a "sparkling" phenotype, while <partinfo>BBa_K173003</partinfo> and in the negative control <partinfo>BBa_F2620</partinfo> did not.
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | '''Quantitative characterization'''
| |
- |
| |
- | ''pH''
| |
- |
| |
- | pH has been measured in grown cultures after the FIRST INOCULUM (in 2% glucose after 24 hours) and after the SECOND INOCULUM (in 10% glucose after 24 or 48 hours). The measurements performed are the following:
| |
- |
| |
- | [[Image:pv_ph_1.jpg|PROTOCOL#2: pH at the end of fermentation (after SECOND INOCULUM).]]
| |
- |
| |
- | [[Image:pv_ph_2.jpg|PROTOCOL#2: pH after the FIRST and the SECOND (end of fermentation) INOCULUM]]
| |
- |
| |
- | [[Image:pv_ph_3.jpg|PROTOCOL#3: pH after the FIRST and the SECOND (end of fermentation) INOCULUM]]
| |
- |
| |
- | The shown results suggest that in strains bearing expressed pdc and adhB the fermentation does not give high levels of organic acids as in negative control strains which do not have pdc and adhB. It is surprising that the pH of <partinfo>BBa_K173003</partinfo> in pSB1AK3 (pdc and adhB without any promoter) is slightly higher than in the negative controls. This could be due to a weak spurious transcription of pdc and adhB, amplified by the high copy number plasmid. This may re-direct part of pyruvate metabolism to ethanol and not to organic acids. Of course this phenomenon should be further investigated.
| |
- |
| |
- | ''Growth curves''
| |
- |
| |
- | <partinfo>BBa_K173021</partinfo> and its suitable negative controls growth was tested in our microplate reader: 200 ul aliquots (3 or 4 replicates) were taken from a just inoculated 30 ml culture (LB + 10% glucose) of the SECOND INOCULUM of [[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Parts_Characterization#PROTOCOL#3| PROTOCOL#3]] and let grow in the microplate reader according to the automatic protocol described in [[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Parts_Characterization#Microplate reader experiments| Microplate reader experiments]]. The microplate was "sealed" with parafilm in order to create an anaerobic condition.
| |
- |
| |
- | [[Image:pv_growth_B9.jpg|Growth curves of <partinfo>BBa_K173003</partinfo>, <partinfo>BBa_K173021</partinfo> in pSB1AK3, <partinfo>BBa_K173021</partinfo> in pSB4C5 + 1uM HSL, <partinfo>BBa_F2620</partinfo> in pSB1A2 negative control, <partinfo>BBa_B0015</partinfo> in pSB1AK3 negative control]]
| |
- |
| |
- | This test showed that <partinfo>BBa_K173021</partinfo> in pSB1AK3 is able to reach much higher OD600 than the other cultures, reaching ? values. <partinfo>BBa_K173021</partinfo> in pSB4C5 both induced and uninduced had comparable growth curves and reached OD600 of about ?. Negative controls (<partinfo>BBa_F2620</partinfo> in pSB1A2 and <partinfo>BBa_B0015</partinfo> in pSB1AK3) had comparable growth curves and reached low OD (about ?). It is surprising that <partinfo>BBa_K173003</partinfo> in pSB1AK3 reached a higher OD (?) than the negative controls.
| |
- |
| |
- | The shown results are in complete accordance with the pH results, confirming that strains bearing <partinfo>BBa_K173021</partinfo> in pSB1AK3 and in pSB4C5 produce less organic acids than the negative controls, hopefully thanks to pdc and adhB and consequently grow better.
| |
- |
| |
- |
| |
- | ''Ethanol production''
| |
- |
| |
- | ===Conclusions===
| |
- |
| |
- | <div align="right">
| |
- | [[#top|Top]]
| |
- | </div>
| |
- |
| |
- | ==BBa_K173007 - aTc inducible device with J23100 promoter==
| |
- | ===Description===
| |
- | This is an aTc sensing device.
| |
- |
| |
- | <partinfo>BBa_J23100</partinfo> promoter drives the constitutive production of tetR repressor (<partinfo>BBa_C0040</partinfo>), which inhibits tetR promoter (<partinfo>BBa_R0040</partinfo>) activity. When aTc is added to the medium, it binds tetR and inhibits it. So, the PoPS output is a function of the aTc concentration.
| |
- |
| |
- | A tight regulation is expected for this inducible system because BBa_J23100 is a strong promoter and so tetR repressor should be produced at extremely high levels.
| |
- |
| |
- | [[Image:Pv_A6_BBa_K173007.png]]
| |
- |
| |
- | The data below are referred to <partinfo>BBa_K173009</partinfo>, which is the measurement system of <partinfo>BBa_K173007</partinfo>.
| |
- |
| |
- | ===Characterization===
| |
- |
| |
- | <html>
| |
- | <table border=1 align="center" cellpadding=5px>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td rowspan=2 valign="bottom" align="center"><b>aTc concentration<br>[ng/ml]</b></td>
| |
- | <td colspan=2 align="center"><b>LB</b></td>
| |
- | <td colspan=2 align="center"><b>M9 supplemented</b></td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <td><b>Doubling time [minutes]</b></td>
| |
- | <td><b>RPU</b></td>
| |
- | <td><b>Doubling time [minutes]</b></td>
| |
- | <td><b>RPU</b></td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr align="center">
| |
- | <td>0</td>
| |
- | <td>35.56</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | <td>59.27</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr align="center">
| |
- | <td>25</td>
| |
- | <td>32.23</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | <td>61.43</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr align="center">
| |
- | <td>50</td>
| |
- | <td>34.50</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | <td>56.74</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr align="center">
| |
- | <td>75</td>
| |
- | <td>43.11</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | <td>65.01</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr align="center">
| |
- | <td>100</td>
| |
- | <td>40.40</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | <td>61.59</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr align="center">
| |
- | <td>200</td>
| |
- | <td>40.20</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | <td>69.73</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr align="center">
| |
- | <td>300</td>
| |
- | <td>43.42</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | <td>66.61</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | </table>
| |
- | </html>
| |
- |
| |
- | ===Conclusions===
| |
- | We demonstrated that this part works as expected, sensing the aTc concentration provided in the culture medium. The transfer function of this sensor has been characterized in standard units (RPUs) in two different growth media (LB and M9 supplemented with glycerol), as well as the metabolic burden (in terms of doubling time) which affects E. coli bearing this part.
| |
- |
| |
- | On the other hand, we did not expect to have a higher GFP synthesis rate per cell after the exponential growth phase than in the exponential phase itself (as reported in the 3rd plot).
| |
- |
| |
- | COMMENTARE QUI IL TIGHT REGULATION
| |
- |
| |
- | <div align="right">
| |
- | [[#top|Top]]
| |
- | </div>
| |
- |
| |
- | ==BBa_K173011 - aTc inducible device with J23118 promoter==
| |
- | ===Description===
| |
- | This is an aTc sensing device.
| |
- |
| |
- | <partinfo>BBa_J23118</partinfo> promoter drives the constitutive production of tetR repressor (<partinfo>BBa_C0040</partinfo>), which inhibits tetR promoter (<partinfo>BBa_R0040</partinfo>) activity. When aTc is added to the medium, it binds tetR and inhibits it. So, the PoPS output is a function of the aTc concentration.
| |
- |
| |
- | A less tight regulation is expected for this inducible system than in <partinfo>BBa_K173007</partinfo> because BBa_J23118 promoter is weaker than BBa_J23100 and so tetR repressor shold be produced at lower levels than in the other sensor.
| |
- |
| |
- | The data below are referred to <partinfo>BBa_K173026</partinfo>, which is the measurement system of <partinfo>BBa_K173011</partinfo>.
| |
- |
| |
- | [[Image:pv_A12_description.png]]
| |
- |
| |
- | ===Characterization===
| |
- | <html>
| |
- | <table border=1 align="center" cellpadding=5px>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td rowspan=2 valign="bottom" align="center"><b>aTc concentration<br>[ng/ml]</b></td>
| |
- | <td colspan=2 align="center"><b>LB</b></td>
| |
- | <td colspan=2 align="center"><b>M9 supplemented</b></td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <td><b>Doubling time [minutes]</b></td>
| |
- | <td><b>RPU</b></td>
| |
- | <td><b>Doubling time [minutes]</b></td>
| |
- | <td><b>RPU</b></td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr align="center">
| |
- | <td>0</td>
| |
- | <td>35.51</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | <td>77.86</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr align="center">
| |
- | <td>25</td>
| |
- | <td>33.35</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | <td>82.20</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr align="center">
| |
- | <td>50</td>
| |
- | <td>40.32</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | <td>80.70</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr align="center">
| |
- | <td>75</td>
| |
- | <td>42.62</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | <td>88.08</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr align="center">
| |
- | <td>100</td>
| |
- | <td>43.44</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | <td>90.28</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr align="center">
| |
- | <td>200</td>
| |
- | <td>45.07</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | <td>92.27</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr align="center">
| |
- | <td>300</td>
| |
- | <td>48.06</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | <td>93.87</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | </table>
| |
- | </html>
| |
- |
| |
- | ===Conclusions===
| |
- | We demonstrated that this part works as expected because GFP is produced as an increasing function of the aTc concentration provided in the culture medium. The transfer function of this sensor has been characterized in standard units (RPUs) in two different growth media (LB and M9 supplemented with glycerol), as well as the metabolic burden (in terms of doubling time) which affects E. coli bearing this part.
| |
- |
| |
- | On the other hand, as for BBa_K173007, we did not expect to have a higher GFP synthesis rate per cell after the exponential growth phase than in the exponential phase itself (as reported in the 3rd plot).
| |
- |
| |
- | COMMENTARE QUI LA PARTE DEL LEAKAGE E CONFRONTARLA CON K173007
| |
- |
| |
- | <div align="right">
| |
- | [[#top|Top]]
| |
- | </div>
| |
- |
| |
- | ==BBa_K173010 - lactose/IPTG inducible device with J23118 promoter==
| |
- | ===Description===
| |
- | This should work as a lactose/IPTG sensor.
| |
- |
| |
- | <partinfo>BBa_J23118</partinfo> promoter drives the constitutive production of lacI repressor (<partinfo>BBa_C0012</partinfo>), which inhibits lac promoter (<partinfo>BBa_R0011</partinfo>) activity. When lactose or IPTG is added to the medium, it binds lacI and inhibits it. So, the PoPS output is a function of lactose/IPTG concentration.
| |
- |
| |
- | Thanks to the hybrid lac promoter (<partinfo>BBa_R0011</partinfo>), designed taking the Plambda promoter (<partinfo>BBa_R0051</partinfo>) and substituting its cI (<partinfo>BBa_C0051</partinfo>) binding sites with two lacI binding sites, the behaviour of this device is not a function of glucose concentration because the wild type CAP binding sites are not present in this artificial lac promoter.
| |
- |
| |
- | [[Image:pv_A11_description.png]]
| |
- |
| |
- | ===Characterization===
| |
- |
| |
- | ===Conclusions===
| |
- | We did not perform any standard measurement on this device because preliminary tests showed that GFP levels of induced and non induced cultures were the same and were equals to <partinfo>BBa_B0033</partinfo> negative control.
| |
- |
| |
- | Unfortunately, we did not check if the sequence of <partinfo>BBa_K173012</partinfo>, so we do not know if it was actually correct. Another possibility is that lacI is produced at so high levels that 2 mM of IPTG is not sufficient to induce the lac promoter.
| |
- |
| |
- | Further tests should be done for this system.
| |
- | <div align="right">
| |
- | [[#top|Top]]
| |
- | </div>
| |
- |
| |
- | = '''Re-built existing parts''' =
| |
- |
| |
- | ==BBa_K173004/BBa_I732019 - beta-galactosidase protein generator==
| |
- | ===Description===
| |
- | This is a beta-galactosidase protein generator with strong RBS.
| |
- |
| |
- | We built up <partinfo>BBa_K173004</partinfo>. It is a twin of <partinfo>BBa_I732019</partinfo>, which was classified as "inconsistent" by iGEM HQ in 2008 and so we decided to improve this part submitting a new consistent DNA to the Registry.
| |
- |
| |
- | This part takes PoPS as input to express lacZ gene (<partinfo>BBa_I732005</partinfo>), encoding for beta-galactosidase enzyme. This enzyme can be used to cleave lactose molecule to glucose and galactose, but can also be used as a reporter protein for colorimetric assays (together with X-Gal or ONPG as a substrate).
| |
- |
| |
- | X-gal is cleaved by β-galactosidase yielding galactose and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-hydroxyindole. The latter is then oxidized into 5,5'-dibromo-4,4'-dichloro-indigo, an insoluble blue product.
| |
- |
| |
- | ===Characterization===
| |
- |
| |
- | ===Conclusions===
| |
- | We improved the existing <partinfo>BBa_I732019</partinfo> part building up <partinfo>BBa_K173004</partinfo> and testing its activity. This new part has been submitted to the Registry, as well as its physical DNA, allowing future users to assemble this beta-gal protein generator in their own project.
| |
- |
| |
- | This part has shown to work as expected when a PoPS input is given, being able to cleave X-Gal on LB agar plates. In our case, we have tested this part with <partinfo>BBa_K173005</partinfo> upstream, which provides a promoter strength of ? RPU.
| |
- |
| |
- | <div align="right">
| |
- | [[#top|Top]]
| |
- | </div>
| |
- |
| |
- | ==BBa_K173005/BBa_Q04400 - tetR QPI==
| |
- | ===Description===
| |
- |
| |
- | [[Image:pv_A4_description.png]]
| |
- |
| |
- | ===Characterization===
| |
- | ===Conclusions===
| |
- | <div align="right">
| |
- | [[#top|Top]]
| |
- | </div>
| |
- |
| |
- | = '''Existing parts from the Registry''' =
| |
- |
| |
- | ==BBa_J23100, BBa_J23101, BBa_J23118 - constitutive promoter family members==
| |
- | ===Description===
| |
- | These three promoters are from the Anderson Promoter Collection, which is a library of constitutive sigma70 bacterial promoters. The strength of each promoter of the library has already been estimated in saturation growth phase cultures in LB, but here we provide the characterization of BBa_J23100 and BBa_J23118 in standard units (RPUs) in LB medium, in order to add experience and data for these BioBricks. BBa_J23101 is the reference standard promoter, so it has RPU=1 for definition.
| |
- |
| |
- | The data shown below are referred to <partinfo>BBa_K173000</partinfo>, <partinfo>BBa_K173001</partinfo> and <partinfo>BBa_K173002</partinfo> that are the measurement parts of respectively <partinfo>BBa_J23100</partinfo>, <partinfo>BBa_J23101</partinfo> and <partinfo>BBa_J23118</partinfo>.
| |
- |
| |
- | ===Characterization===
| |
- | <html>
| |
- | <table border=1 align="center" cellpadding=5px>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td rowspan=2 valign="bottom" align="center"><b>Part</b></td>
| |
- | <td colspan=2 align="center"><b>LB</b></td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td><b>Doubling time [minutes]</b></td>
| |
- | <td><b>RPU</b></td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr align="center">
| |
- | <td>BBa_J23100<br>(in BBa_J61002 plasmid)</td>
| |
- | <td>35.63</td>
| |
- | <td>not computed</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr align="center">
| |
- | <td>BBa_J23101<br>(in BBa_J61002 plasmid)</td>
| |
- | <td>37</td>
| |
- | <td>not computed</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr align="center">
| |
- | <td>BBa_J23118<br>(in BBa_J61002 plasmid)</td>
| |
- | <td>35.81</td>
| |
- | <td>not computed</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr align="center">
| |
- | <td>BBa_K173000</td>
| |
- | <td>36.32</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr align="center">
| |
- | <td>BBa_K173001</td>
| |
- | <td>36.34</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr align="center">
| |
- | <td>BBa_K173002</td>
| |
- | <td>35.44</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | </table>
| |
- | </html>
| |
- |
| |
- | ===Conclusions===
| |
- | RPU estimation of these promoters was not present in the Registry and even the doubling time of these parts was not documented. We added these data in the pages of <partinfo>BBa_J23100</partinfo>, <partinfo>BBa_J23101</partinfo> and <partinfo>BBa_J23118</partinfo> characterized parts, hoping that they can be useful for promoter comparison in standard units.
| |
- |
| |
- | If we consider the promoter ranking, provided in saturation phase in the [http://partsregistry.org/Promoters/Catalog/Anderson Anderson Promoter Collection Registry page], the estimated strength in RPU of BBa_J23100 and BBa_J23118 are in accordance with these values: INSERIRE I VALORI E COMMENTARE
| |
- |
| |
- | Note: <partinfo>BBa_J61002</partinfo> plasmid is equals to pSB1A2 with a RFP expression system downstream of the cloning site.
| |
- |
| |
- | <div align="right">
| |
- | [[#top|Top]]
| |
- | </div>
| |
- |
| |
- | ==BBa_F2620 - 3OC6HSL receiver device==
| |
- | ===Description===
| |
- | This device gives PoPS as output and can be induced with 3OC6-HSL autoinducer molecule: it binds luxR protein (encoded by <partinfo>BBa_C0062</partinfo>), which is constitutively expressed by tetR promoter (<partinfo>BBa_R0040</partinfo>). LuxR-HSL complex can work as a transcriptional activator for lux promoter (<partinfo>BBa_R0062</partinfo>).
| |
- |
| |
- | Several studies have been performed on this BioBrick. Here we provide the experimental characterization we performed during this summer. The tests have been performed through <partinfo>BBa_T9002</partinfo> measurement system, which has a GFP protein generator downstream.
| |
- |
| |
- | ===Characterization===
| |
- | <html>
| |
- | <table border=1 align="center" cellpadding=5px>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td rowspan=2 valign="bottom" align="center"><b>3OC6-HSL<br>concentration<br></b></td>
| |
- | <td colspan=2 align="center"><b>LB</b></td>
| |
- | <td colspan=2 align="center"><b>M9 supplemented</b></td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <td><b>Doubling time [minutes]</b></td>
| |
- | <td><b>RPU</b></td>
| |
- | <td><b>Doubling time [minutes]</b></td>
| |
- | <td><b>RPU</b></td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td align="center">0 nM</td>
| |
- | <td>Doubling time</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | <td>Doubling time</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td align="center">0.1 nM</td>
| |
- | <td>Doubling time</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | <td>Doubling time</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td align="center">1 nM</td>
| |
- | <td>Doubling time</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | <td>Doubling time</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td align="center">10 nM</td>
| |
- | <td>Doubling time</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | <td>Doubling time</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td align="center">100 nM</td>
| |
- | <td>Doubling time</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | <td>Doubling time</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td align="center">1 uM</td>
| |
- | <td>Doubling time</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | <td>Doubling time</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td align="center">10 uM</td>
| |
- | <td>Doubling time</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | <td>Doubling time</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | </table>
| |
- | </html>
| |
- |
| |
- | ===Conclusions===
| |
- | The induction curve of the receiver device, reported in <partinfo>BBa_F2620</partinfo> page (M9 supplemented medium), was represented in PoPS units, while ours is reported in RPUs and has been obtained through a very similar protocol (see Growth conditions section). Anyway, the experiments we performed in M9 supplemented medium confirmed the induction curve shape of this device, with a switch point between ? and ?.
| |
- |
| |
- | We also estimated this transfer function of this device in LB medium, for which no data were reported in the Registry.
| |
- |
| |
- | <div align="right">
| |
- | [[#top|Top]]
| |
- | </div>
| |
- |
| |
- | == BBa_K116001 - nhaA promoter ==
| |
- | <html><a href="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php/Part:BBa_K116001" target="_blank">BBa_K116001</a> from iGEM 2008 NYMU-Taipei</html>
| |
- |
| |
- | We received this BioBrick from iGEM in September but the bacterial strain that contained the plasmid wasn't declared. So we decided to sequence it as check and transform it into E.coli TOP10.
| |
- |
| |
- | We wanted to perform some experiments to better understand how it works and if can be successfully used.
| |
- |
| |
- | We performed several experiments with different LB medium and we got almost the same results.
| |
- | We used:
| |
- | *LBK (NaCl 0M) (pH 5.5 - 6.6 - 7.5 - 8.5)
| |
- | *LB NaCl 70mM (pH 5.5 - 6.6 - 7.5 - 8.5)
| |
- | *LB NaCl 171mM (pH 5.5 - 6.6 - 7.5 - 8.5)
| |
- | *LB NaCl 250mM (pH 5.5 - 6.6 - 7.5 - 8.5)
| |
- | *LB NaCl 600mM (pH 10 - 11.2)
| |
- |
| |
- | Here we show just two experiments to explicate our work. You can download the complete list from <html><a href="linkaimed11" target="_blank">this link</a></html>.
| |
- |
| |
- | ====Experiment Na+ 0M====
| |
- | <hr/>
| |
- | =====Motivation=====
| |
- | In our opinion the working principle of the antiporter Na+/H+ channel described in [Rachel Karpel et al., Etana Padan et al., N. Dover et al.] makes the nhaA promoter a Na+ sensor and only under certain conditions (presence of Na+) a pH sensor.
| |
- |
| |
- | =====Methods=====
| |
- | *We prepared falcons of LBK (potassium - 87mM - instead of sodium) and adjusted pH using KOH and HCl to values 5.5, 6.6, 7.5 and 8.5.
| |
- | *We inoculated 8ul of Invitrogen TOP10 containing BBa_K116002 into 4ml of LB + Amp and incubated overnight at 37°C, 220 rpm. We did the same for TOP10 with BBa_K173001 and BBa_B0033 inside.
| |
- | *Next morning we put 50ul from each of the three falcon into 5ml of LBK pH 6.6 and incubated again for about four hours and a half at 37°C, 220 rpm.
| |
- | *We measured the final OD with TECAN F200 and diluted each genetic circuit into four falcons with LBK at different pH (5.5 - 6.6 - 7.5 - 8.5) in order to obtain a same OD equal to 0,02 (12 falcons overall).
| |
- | *Then we performed a 6 hours' experiment with measures of absorbance and fluorescence every 5 minutes with TECAN F200. Each value shown is the mean of three measures.
| |
- | =====Results=====
| |
- | {|align="center"
| |
- | |[[Image:BBa K116001 Absorbance exp1.png|thumb|center|BBa_K116001 Absorbance]]
| |
- | |[[Image:BBa_K116001_Fluorescence_exp1.png|thumb|center|BBa_K116001 Fluorescence]]
| |
- | |-
| |
- | |[[Image:PH 55 Fluorescence exp1.png|thumb|center|pH 5,5: Fluorescence]]
| |
- | |[[Image:PH 66 Fluorescence exp1.png|thumb|center|pH 6,6: Fluorescence]]
| |
- | |-
| |
- | |[[Image:PH 75 Fluorescence exp1.png|thumb|center|pH 7,5: Fluorescence]]
| |
- | |[[Image:PH 85 Fluorescence exp1.png|thumb|center|pH 8,5: Fluorescence]]
| |
- | |}
| |
- |
| |
- | =====Comments=====
| |
- | As expected BBa_K116001 didn't produce any GFP. So we can consider it a Na+ sensor and only secondarily a pH sensor.
| |
- |
| |
- | ====Experiment Na+ 250mM====
| |
- | <hr/>
| |
- | =====Motivation=====
| |
- | We’ll try again to make E.coli producing GFP at the variation of pH.
| |
- |
| |
- | =====Methods=====
| |
- | *We prepared falcons of LB NaCl 250mM and adjusted pH using KOH and HCl to values 5.5, 6.6, 7.5 and 8.5.
| |
- | *We inoculated 8ul of Invitrogen TOP10 containing BBa_K116001 into 4ml of LB + Amp and incubated overnight at 37°C, 220 rpm. We did the same for TOP10 with BBa_K173001 and BBa_B0033 inside.
| |
- | *Next morning we put 50ul from each of the three falcon into 5ml of LB NaCl 250 mM pH 6.6 and incubated again for five hours and at 37°C, 220 rpm.
| |
- | *We measured the final OD with TECAN F200 and diluted each genetic circuit into four falcons with LB NaCl 250mM at different pH (5.5 - 6.6 - 7.5 - 8.5) in order to obtain a same OD equal to 0,02 (12 falcons overall).
| |
- | *Then we performed an experiment of 21 hours duration with measures of absorbance and fluorescence every 5 minutes with TECAN F200. Each value is the mean of three measures.
| |
- |
| |
- | =====Results=====
| |
- | {|align="center"
| |
- | |[[Image:BBa K116001 Absorbance exp4.png|thumb|center|BBa_K116001 Absorbance]]
| |
- | |[[Image:BBa_K116001_Fluorescence_exp4.png|thumb|center|BBa_K116001 Fluorescence]]
| |
- | |-
| |
- | |[[Image:PH 55 Fluorescence exp4.png|thumb|center|pH 5,5: Fluorescence]]
| |
- | |[[Image:PH 66 Fluorescence exp4.png|thumb|center|pH 6,6: Fluorescence]]
| |
- | |-
| |
- | |[[Image:PH 75 Fluorescence exp4.png|thumb|center|pH 7,5: Fluorescence]]
| |
- | |[[Image:PH 85 Fluorescence exp4.png|thumb|center|pH 8,5: Fluorescence]]
| |
- | |}
| |
- |
| |
- | =====Comments=====
| |
- | We didn't expect this. After looking better for a motivation in some articles ([Rachel Karpel et al.]) we think this could be because of the E.coli strain: we use TOP10 while a special strain (delta-pump) without some membrane proteins that regulate E.coli homeostasis is used in other experiments.
| |
- |
| |
- | =====Final considerations=====
| |
- | In our opinion this sensor (primarily sodium sensor and secondarily pH sensor) needs very particular conditions to work (first of all a specific bacterial strain) we couldn’t reproduce, so we consider it almost unusable.
| |
- |
| |
- | <div align="right">
| |
- | [[#top|Top]]
| |
- | </div>
| |
- |
| |
- | ==BBa_K112808 - Enterobacteria phage T4 Lysis Device==
| |
- | ===Description===
| |
- |
| |
- | ===Characterization===
| |
- |
| |
- | ===Clonclusions===
| |
- |
| |
- | <div align="right">
| |
- | [[#top|Top]]
| |
- | </div>
| |
- |
| |
- | ==BBa_R0011 - Plac hybrid promoter==
| |
- |
| |
- | ===Description===
| |
- | The hybrid lac promoter (BBa_R0011) has been designed taking the Plambda promoter (BBa_R0051) and substituting its cI (BBa_C0051) binding sites with two lacI binding sites.
| |
- |
| |
- | This promoter can be repressed by lacI (BBa_C0012), which can be repressed by lactose or IPTG, providing a lactose/IPTG inducible system. Differently from wild type lac promoter, this part does not have any CAP binding sites, so its behaviour is glucose-independent.
| |
- |
| |
- | Even if lacI is not expressed in this BioBrick, strains bearing a genomic copy of lacI can repress this promoter, which acts as a glucose-independent lactose/IPTG sensor. In the other strains BBa_R0011 acts as a constitutive promoter.
| |
- |
| |
- | Here we provide the characterization of this promoter in E. coli TOP10, which has a lacI genomic copy, constitutively expressed in a weak manner.
| |
- |
| |
- | The data below are referred to <partinfo>BBa_K173025</partinfo>, which is the measurement system of <partinfo>BBa_R0011</partinfo>.
| |
- |
| |
- | ===Characterization===
| |
- |
| |
- | <html>
| |
- | <table border=1 align="center" cellpadding=5px>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td rowspan=2 valign="bottom" align="center"><b>IPTG concentration<br></b></td>
| |
- | <td colspan=2 align="center"><b>LB</b></td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <td><b>Doubling time [minutes]</b></td>
| |
- | <td><b>RPU</b></td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td align="center">0 uM</td>
| |
- | <td>Doubling time</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td align="center">?</td>
| |
- | <td>Doubling time</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td align="center">?</td>
| |
- | <td>Doubling time</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td align="center">?</td>
| |
- | <td>Doubling time</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td align="center">?</td>
| |
- | <td>Doubling time</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td align="center">1 mM</td>
| |
- | <td>Doubling time</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | <tr>
| |
- | <td align="center">?</td>
| |
- | <td>Doubling time</td>
| |
- | <td>RPU</td>
| |
- | </tr>
| |
- |
| |
- | </table>
| |
- | </html>
| |
- |
| |
- | ===Conclusions===
| |
- |
| |
- | <div align="right">
| |
- | [[#top|Top]]
| |
- | </div>
| |
| | | |
| = '''Growth conditions''' = | | = '''Growth conditions''' = |
Line 875: |
Line 54: |
| *8 ul of long term storage glycerol stock were inoculated in 5 ml of LB + suitable antibiotic in a 15 ml falcon tube and incubated at 37°C, 220 rpm for about 16 hours. | | *8 ul of long term storage glycerol stock were inoculated in 5 ml of LB + suitable antibiotic in a 15 ml falcon tube and incubated at 37°C, 220 rpm for about 16 hours. |
| *The grown cultures were then diluted 1:100 in 5 ml of LB or M9 supplemented medium and incubated in the same conditions as before for about 4 hours. | | *The grown cultures were then diluted 1:100 in 5 ml of LB or M9 supplemented medium and incubated in the same conditions as before for about 4 hours. |
- | *These new cultures were diluted to an OD600 of 0.02 (measured with a microplate reader, 200 ul of volume per well, not with a 1 cm pathlength cuvette) in a sufficient amount of medium to fill all the desired microplate wells. | + | *These new cultures were diluted to an O.D.600 of 0.02 (measured with a TECAN F200 microplate reader on a 200 ul of volume per well; it is not comparable with the 1 cm pathlength cuvette) in a sufficient amount of medium to fill all the desired microplate wells. |
- | *These new dilutions were aliquoted in the microplate, avoiding to perform dynamic experiments in the microplate frame (see Measurement section for details). All the wells were filled with a 200 ul volume. | + | *These new dilutions were aliquoted in a flat-bottom 96-well microplate, avoiding to perform dynamic experiments in the microplate frame (see [https://2009.igem.org/Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Methods_Materials/Evaporation Frame effect section] for details). All the wells were filled with a 200 ul volume. |
| *If required, 2 ul of inducer were added to each single well. | | *If required, 2 ul of inducer were added to each single well. |
| *The microplate was incubated in the Tecan Infinite F200 microplate reader and fluorescence (when required) and absorbance were measured with this automatic protocol: | | *The microplate was incubated in the Tecan Infinite F200 microplate reader and fluorescence (when required) and absorbance were measured with this automatic protocol: |
| **37°C constant for all the experiment; | | **37°C constant for all the experiment; |
- | **sample time of 5 minutes; | + | **sampling time of 5 minutes; |
| **fluorescence gain of 50; | | **fluorescence gain of 50; |
| + | **O.D. filter was 600 nm; |
| **GFP filters were 485nm (ex) / 540nm (em); | | **GFP filters were 485nm (ex) / 540nm (em); |
| **15 seconds of linear shaking (3mm amplitude) followed by 10 seconds of waiting before the measurements in order to make a homogeneous culture. | | **15 seconds of linear shaking (3mm amplitude) followed by 10 seconds of waiting before the measurements in order to make a homogeneous culture. |
- | **Variable experiment duration time (from 3 to 7 hours). | + | **Variable experiment duration time (from 3 to 24 hours). |
- | | + | |
- | | + | |
- | | + | |
| | | |
| ==Fermentation experiments== | | ==Fermentation experiments== |
- |
| |
- |
| |
| ==='''PROTOCOL#1=== | | ==='''PROTOCOL#1=== |
- | *8 ul of long term storage glycerol stock were inoculated in 8 ml of LB + suitable antibiotic in a 15 ml falcon tube and incubated at 37°C, 220 rpm in anaerobic conditions for about 16 hours. This step has been called FIRST INOCULUM. | + | *8 ul of long term storage glycerol stock were inoculated in 8 ml of LB + suitable antibiotic in a 15 ml falcon tube and incubated at 37°C, 220 rpm in anaerobic conditions for about 16 hours. This step will be indicated as FIRST INOCULUM. |
- | *The culture was diluted 1:100 into 17 ml of LB + suitable antibiotic and incubated at 37°C, 220 rpm for about 6 hours (anaerobic). This step has been called SECOND INOCULUM. | + | *The culture was diluted 1:100 into 17 ml of LB + suitable antibiotic and incubated at 37°C, 220 rpm for about 6 hours (anaerobic). This step will be indicated as SECOND INOCULUM. |
| *After 6 hours, 17 ml of a filter-sterilized LB + suitable antibiotic + 20% glucose was added to the culture (yielding a final 34 ml culture + 10% glucose). It was also induced in this step when required. It was incubated under the same conditions as before for 48 hours. | | *After 6 hours, 17 ml of a filter-sterilized LB + suitable antibiotic + 20% glucose was added to the culture (yielding a final 34 ml culture + 10% glucose). It was also induced in this step when required. It was incubated under the same conditions as before for 48 hours. |
- | *After 48 hours, the pH of the pH of the culture was measured through Litmus test and the culture was centrifuged at 4°C, 9000 rpm for 15 minutes. | + | *After 48 hours, the pH of the culture was measured through Litmus test and the culture was centrifuged at 4°C, 9000 rpm for 15 minutes. |
| *Finally, the supernatant was analyzed through gas chromatography or potassium dichromate kit. | | *Finally, the supernatant was analyzed through gas chromatography or potassium dichromate kit. |
- |
| |
- |
| |
| | | |
| ===PROTOCOL#2=== | | ===PROTOCOL#2=== |
- | *8 ul of long term storage glycerol stock were inoculated in 8 ml of LB + suitable antibiotic + 2% of glucose in a 15 ml falcon tube and incubated at 37°C in unshaked anaerobic conditions for about 24 hours. This step has been called FIRST INOCULUM. | + | *8 ul of long term storage glycerol stock were inoculated in 8 ml of LB + suitable antibiotic + 2% of glucose in a 15 ml falcon tube and incubated at 37°C in unshaked anaerobic conditions for about 24 hours. This step will be indicated as FIRST INOCULUM. |
- | *The pH of the culture was measured through Litmus test and then it was centrifuged at 25°C, 2500 rpm for 10 minutes. | + | *The culture was centrifuged at 25°C, 2500 rpm for 10 minutes. |
- | *Supernatant was discarded and the resuspended pellet was inoculated into 30 ml of LB + suitable antibiotic + 10% of glucose in a 50 ml falcon tube and this new culture was induced (when required) and incubated at 37°C, 220 rpm for 48 hours (anaerobic). This step has been called SECOND INOCULUM. | + | *Supernatant was discarded and the resuspended pellet was inoculated into 30 ml of LB + suitable antibiotic + 10% of glucose in a 50 ml falcon tube and this new culture was induced (when required) and incubated at 37°C, 220 rpm for 48 hours (anaerobic). This step will be indicated as SECOND INOCULUM. |
- | *After 48 hours, the pH of the culture was measured again through Litmus test and the culture was centrifuged at 4°C, 9000 rpm for 15 minutes. | + | *After 48 hours, the pH of the culture was measured through Litmus test and the culture was centrifuged at 4°C, 9000 rpm for 15 minutes. |
| *Finally, the supernatant was analyzed through gas chromatography or potassium dichromate kit. | | *Finally, the supernatant was analyzed through gas chromatography or potassium dichromate kit. |
- |
| |
- |
| |
| | | |
| ===PROTOCOL#3=== | | ===PROTOCOL#3=== |
- | *8 ul of long term storage glycerol stock were inoculated in 8 ml of LB + suitable antibiotic + 2% of glucose in a 15 ml falcon tube and incubated at 37°C, 220 rpm anaerobic conditions for about 24 hours. This step has been called FIRST INOCULUM. | + | *8 ul of long term storage glycerol stock were inoculated in 8 ml of LB + suitable antibiotic + 2% of glucose in a 15 ml falcon tube and incubated at 37°C, 220 rpm anaerobic conditions for about 24 hours. This step will be indicated as FIRST INOCULUM. |
- | *After 24 hours, 300 ul of the grown culture were inoculated into 30 ml of LB + suitable antibiotic + 10% glucose and the pH of the remaining amount of grown culture was measured through Litmus test. The new 30 ml culture was induced when required and it was incubated under the same conditions as before for 24 or 48 hours (anaerobic). This step has been called SECOND INOCULUM. | + | *After 24 hours, 300 ul of the grown culture were inoculated into 30 ml of LB + suitable antibiotic + 10% glucose. |
- | *After 24 or 48 hours, the pH of the culture was measured again through Litmus test and the culture was centrifuged at 4°C, 9000 rpm for 15 minutes. | + | *The new 30 ml culture was induced when required and it was incubated under the same conditions as before for 24 or 48 hours (anaerobic). This step will be indicated as SECOND INOCULUM. |
| + | *After 24 or 48 hours, the pH of the culture was measured through Litmus test and the culture was centrifuged at 4°C, 9000 rpm for 15 minutes. |
| *Finally, the supernatant was analyzed through gas chromatography or potassium dichromate kit. | | *Finally, the supernatant was analyzed through gas chromatography or potassium dichromate kit. |
| | | |
Line 922: |
Line 94: |
| = '''Data analysis''' = | | = '''Data analysis''' = |
| ===Growth curves=== | | ===Growth curves=== |
- | The presented growth curves have all been processed as OD600_culture-OD600_broth for each time sample. OD600_broth is the medium in the same conditions as in the culture (e.g. induced with the same inducer concentration as in the culture).
| + | All our growth curves have been obtained subtracting for each time sample the broth O.D.600 measurement from that of the culture; broth was considered in the same conditions of the culture (e.g. induced with the same inducer concentration). |
| + | |
| ===Doubling time=== | | ===Doubling time=== |
| The natural logarithm of the growth curves (processed according to the above section) was computed and the linear phase (corresponding to the bacterial exponential growth phase) was isolated by visual inspection. Then the linear regression was performed in order to estimate the slope of the line ''m''. Finally the doubling time was estimated as ''d''=ln(2)/''m'' [minutes]. | | The natural logarithm of the growth curves (processed according to the above section) was computed and the linear phase (corresponding to the bacterial exponential growth phase) was isolated by visual inspection. Then the linear regression was performed in order to estimate the slope of the line ''m''. Finally the doubling time was estimated as ''d''=ln(2)/''m'' [minutes]. |
| | | |
- | In the case of multiple growth curves for a strain, the mean value of the processed curves was computed for each time sample and then this procedure was performed. | + | In the case of multiple growth curves for a strain, the mean value of the processed curves was computed for each time sample before applying the above described procedure. |
| + | |
| ===Relative Promoter Units (RPUs)=== | | ===Relative Promoter Units (RPUs)=== |
- | The RPUs are standard units proposed by Kelly J. et al., 2008, in which the transcriptional strength of a promoter can be measured using a reference standard, just like the ground in electric circuits. | + | The RPUs are standard units proposed by [[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Project/References#18| Kelly J. et al., 2008]], in which the transcriptional strength of a promoter can be measured using a reference standard, just like the ground in electric circuits. |
| | | |
| RPUs have been computed as: | | RPUs have been computed as: |
Line 935: |
Line 109: |
| | | |
| in which: | | in which: |
- | *phi is the promoter of interest and J23101 is the reference standard promoter (taken from Anderson Promoter Collection); | + | *phi is the considered promoter and J23101 is the reference standard promoter (taken from Anderson Promoter Collection); |
- | *F is the blanked fluorescence of the culture, computed as F_culture-F_negative_control for each time sample, where the negative control is a non-fluorescent strain (in our experiment it is usually used <partinfo>BBa_B0032</partinfo> or <partinfo>BBa_B0033</partinfo>); | + | *F is the blanked fluorescence of the culture, computed subtracting for each time sample fluorescence measure for negative control from that of culture, where the negative control is a non-fluorescent strain (in our experiment it is usually used TOP10 strain bearing <partinfo>BBa_B0032</partinfo> or <partinfo>BBa_B0033</partinfo>, which are symmply RBSs do not have expression systems for reporter genes); |
- | *ABS is the blanked absorbance (OD600) of the culture, computed as described in "Growth curves" section. | + | *ABS is the blanked absorbance (O.D.600) of the culture, computed as described in "Growth curves" section. |
| | | |
- | RPU measurement has the following advantages: | + | RPU measurement has the following advantages (under suitable conditions) |
| *it is proportional to PoPS (Polymerase Per Second), a very important parameter that expresses the transcription rate of a promoter; | | *it is proportional to PoPS (Polymerase Per Second), a very important parameter that expresses the transcription rate of a promoter; |
| *it uses a reference standard and so measurements can be compared between different laboratories. | | *it uses a reference standard and so measurements can be compared between different laboratories. |
| | | |
- | The hypotheses on which RPU theory is based can be found in Kelly J. et al., 2008, as well as all the mathematical steps. From our point of view, the main hypotheses to satisfy are the following: | + | The hypotheses on which RPU theory is based can be found in [[Team:UNIPV-Pavia/Project/References#18| Kelly J. et al., 2008]], as well as all the mathematical steps. From our point of view, the main hypotheses that have to be satisfied are the following: |
| *the reporter protein must have a half life higher than the experiment duration (we use GFPmut3, <partinfo>BBa_E0240</partinfo>, which has an estimated half life of at least 24 hours, and the experiments duration is always less than 7 hours); | | *the reporter protein must have a half life higher than the experiment duration (we use GFPmut3, <partinfo>BBa_E0240</partinfo>, which has an estimated half life of at least 24 hours, and the experiments duration is always less than 7 hours); |
| *strain, plasmid copy number, antibiotic, growth medium, growth conditions, protein generator assembled downstream of the promoter must be the same in the promoter of interest and in J23101 reference standard. | | *strain, plasmid copy number, antibiotic, growth medium, growth conditions, protein generator assembled downstream of the promoter must be the same in the promoter of interest and in J23101 reference standard. |
- | *steady state must be validated, so the considered RPU values are in exponential growth phase, when dF/dt/ABS (proportional to the GFP synthesis rate per cell) does not vary. | + | *steady state must be valid, so (dF/dt)/ABS (proportional to the GFP synthesis rate per cell) must be constant. |
| + | |
| + | ==Inducible systems== |
| + | Every experiment is performed on the following cultures: |
| + | |
| + | *the culture of interest (system studied expressing GFP) |
| + | *the benchmarck used to evaluate R.P.U. (<partinfo>BBa_K173001</partinfo> measurement part, that is <partinfo>BBa_J23101</partinfo> with <partinfo>BBa_E0240</partinfo> downstream) |
| + | *a negative control (generally, <partinfo>BBa_B0033</partinfo> RBS) |
| + | |
| + | For inducible systems several plots are reported. The first plot is a panel containing 4 subplots, numerated this way: |
| + | {| |
| + | |(1) |
| + | |(2) |
| + | |- |
| + | |(3) |
| + | |} |
| + | |
| + | Plot (1) contains growth curves of the cultures, after blank value has been removed. Every curve is calculated averaging on three replicates of the same culture and subtracting the blank for each time sample. Blank is calculated averaging the replicates of blank wells. |
| + | |
| + | Plot (2) shows the logarithm of absorbance in exponential phase of bacterial growth, determined by a visual inspection of log-plots. These values are used to evaluate doubling time and R.P.U.. |
| + | |
| + | Plot (3) contains (dGFP/dt)/O.D., the value named S_cell in Kelly J. et al., 2008 procedure for RPU evaluation. |
| + | |
| + | In these plots are reported black veritcal lines that define the range of values used to evaluate RPU. It is important to underline, as explained in next paragraph, that RPU are calculated on cultures at the same O.D. level, not at the same time. |
| + | |
| + | The second graphic shows S_cell VS O.D.. This plot allows the conparison of S_cell values between different cultures, that are supposed to reach the same level of growth not at the same time, but at the same O.D. value. |
| + | |
| + | The third graphic shows the induction curve. The RPU value is calculated on S_cell values corresponding to O.D. values in exponential phase (typically, from 0.05 to 0.16). |
| + | The curve is obtained averaging in time S_cell values corresponding to exponential phase. |
| + | |
| + | Error bars rapresent the minimum and maximum value of R.P.U. belonging to the range of O.D. in exponential phase. |
| + | |
| + | In RPU evaluation the hypothesis of steady state has to be validated. This hypothesis corresponds to a constant behavior of S_cell in time. In exponential phase in several cases it is possible to observe that this variable isn't constant, but grows after exponential phase is over. This behaviour is totally unexpected and can't be justifyed by any biological argument. |
| + | |
| + | It is also important to underline that the reported methodology has shown how variable R.P.U. value can be. This parameter, in fact, is very sensitive to the respondind O.D. value, as shown from induction curves, where error bars are sometimes wide among the curve. So it is foundamental to define a standardized methodology for RPU evaluation, not sensitive to O.D. or time choose. |
| | | |
| <div align="right"> | | <div align="right"> |