Team:Imperial College London/Wetlab/Results
From 2009.igem.org
(→Module 2) |
(→Chemoinduction) |
||
(11 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
====[https://2009.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College_London/Wetlab/Results/Cheminduction IPTG Growth]==== | ====[https://2009.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College_London/Wetlab/Results/Cheminduction IPTG Growth]==== | ||
+ | The cells are grown in varying amounts of IPTG to test if IPTG has any toxic effect on the cells. <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
==Autoinduction== | ==Autoinduction== | ||
Line 23: | Line 25: | ||
==Thermoinduction== | ==Thermoinduction== | ||
- | [https://2009.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College_London/Wetlab/Results/Thermoinduction Thermoinducible promoter | + | ====[https://2009.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College_London/Wetlab/Results/Thermoinduction Thermoinducible promoter system]==== |
+ | The thermoinducible system with GFP is tested and shown that there is activation of the promoter when the temperature is raised to 42°C. <br> | ||
- | [https://2009.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College_London/Wetlab/Results/Thermoinduction1 Thermoinducible promoter part 2] | + | <!-- |
+ | ====[https://2009.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College_London/Wetlab/Results/Thermoinduction1 Thermoinducible promoter part 2: Fluorescence]==== | ||
+ | --> | ||
==Module 2== | ==Module 2== | ||
- | ====[https://2009.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Team:Imperial_College_London/Wetlab/Results/Colanic Colanic acid results]==== | + | ====[https://2009.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Team:Imperial_College_London/Wetlab/Results/Colanic Colanic acid results part 1 : Absorbance]==== |
+ | |||
+ | ====[https://2009.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College_London/Wetlab/Results/Colanicfl Colanic acid results part 2: Fluorescence]==== | ||
+ | <br> | ||
==Module 3== | ==Module 3== | ||
- | ====[[Team:Imperial_College_London/Wetlab/Results/RestrictionDigest |Restriction Enzyme | + | ====[[Team:Imperial_College_London/Wetlab/Results/RestrictionDigest |Restriction Enzyme activity]]==== |
An experiment investigating the effects of methylation on the amount of cleavage by varying concentrations of restriction enzymes. | An experiment investigating the effects of methylation on the amount of cleavage by varying concentrations of restriction enzymes. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
=Others= | =Others= | ||
+ | |||
=Calibration= | =Calibration= | ||
Latest revision as of 02:49, 22 October 2009
Wet Lab Results
There's a brief description of each wet lab results and you can click through to find more detail on them.
For everyday experiments and minor results, please refer to our Notebook.
Calibration
OD calibration
A calibration curve is generated that relates the OD600 readings with the actual colony forming units when plated on agar plates.
Chemoinduction
IPTG Growth
The cells are grown in varying amounts of IPTG to test if IPTG has any toxic effect on the cells.
Autoinduction
PcstA activity with different media
The activity of the PcstA promoter is monitered by measuring GFP fluorescence after overnight growth in different types of media.
Thermoinduction
Thermoinducible promoter system
The thermoinducible system with GFP is tested and shown that there is activation of the promoter when the temperature is raised to 42°C.
Module 2
Colanic acid results part 1 : Absorbance
Colanic acid results part 2: Fluorescence
Module 3
Restriction Enzyme activity
An experiment investigating the effects of methylation on the amount of cleavage by varying concentrations of restriction enzymes.
Others
Calibration
OD calibration
- To make a calibration curve linking our O.D. 600 to colony forming units.
Module 1
Module 2
pH and GFP
How cell lysis varies with pH (using GFP as marker). Chemically induced encapsulation 18-09
Module 3
Genome Deletion
Restriction Enzyme testing in Dam+ve and Dam-ve Strains
An experiment investigating the effects of methylation on the amount of cleavage by varying concentrations of restriction enzymes.
Temporal Control
Chemical induction
Cell growth for different IPTG concentrations
Testing if IPTG toxicity affects cell growth, and consequently, production of protein of interest.
Rationale:
IPTG has been shown in the past to have toxic effects on cell growth if administered in large quantities [http://openwetware.org/wiki/IGEM:IMPERIAL/2009/M1/Modelling/Analysis/literatureIPTG (literature review IPTG)]. However, production of the protein of interest will be induced with IPTG and from the Modelling results, output yield of protein of interest will increase with concentration of IPTG, provided that the levels are non-toxic. The results we present here are a study on how IPTG exerts its effects on cellular growth rate, in order to determine if the concentrations we are using have negative effects on the cultures, and consequently, how this will affect output levels of drug of interest.
Lac-RFP tests
Prelim results on 13th October
Autoinduction
Diauxic growth
Growth in the presence of Glucose only
Testing the effects of glucose concentration on cell growth: This experiment will be linked to diauxic growth.
Rationale:
A cell culture in the presence of glucose grows exponentially. Once it uses up its resource, it stops growing and the population density saturates.
Raw data 06/10
Media:II09_rawdata.xls
Growth in the presence of Glucose + 2ndary carbon sources
Testing the effects of different secondary carbon sources on cell growth with a fixed initial glucose concentration.
Rationale: A cell culture in the presence of glucose grows exponentially. Once it uses up its resource, it stops growing and the population density saturates. However, in the presence of a secondary carbon source, the cells enter a second exponential phase where they grow and saturate once again when the secondary source has been used up.
NOTE: Same raw data file as above!
Growth in the presence of Glucose + Xylose
Testing the effects of different xylose concentrations on cell growth, for a fixed initial glucose concentration: This experiment will be linked to diauxic growth.
Rationale: As above
CRP promoter
Review on CRP promoter results
Prelim test-Growth on glucose and xylose and effect on CRP promoter 07-10
A simple test of all xylose and all glucose to test if GFP is generated. Found out that GFP levels are about the same and quite low for both xylose and glucose (ie both do not express)
CRP promoter and varying glucose 09-10
Growth on different media and effect on CRP promoter 10-10
Supposing that Secondary carbon sources repress the CRP promoter, we proceeded to test which media gives the best CRP output. It appears to be 10% Casamino acid.
download raw data
Prelim test on GFP and RFP production from construct CRP-GFP-Lac-RFP
CRP promoter appears to be constitutively on, whether Glucose or Xylose is present.
Most likely because 0.05% glucose is unable to repress CRP promoter.
CRP promoter and varying glucose 13-10
CRP promoter and varying glucose 14-10
Thermoinduction
Harvard+GFP results 6-10
Testing the effects of temperature on fluorescence output.
Rationale:
Genome deletion is repressed at low temperatures, and triggered when the temperature rises.
Here, we are testing the p-lambda promoter by attaching GFP to it, in order to show how the fluorescence output varies when the temperature rises.
raw data
6th October
23rd September