EPF-Lausanne/12 October 2009

From 2009.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Wet Lab)
 
(8 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 26: Line 26:
==Wet Lab==
==Wet Lab==
 +
Digestion assay (with Pst1 and SpeI) in order to check the double transformant -KO strand JRG1046.
 +
We checked 3 clones of each double transformant: RO1.1+BB1 and RO2.4+BB1.
-
==People in the lab==
+
N.B: RO1.1+BB1 clone #1 culture wasn't pink at all
 +
 +
Took image of agarose gel:
 +
[[Image:121009gel_DTjrg1046.JPG|200px|thumb|center]]
 +
<br><br>
 +
 +
RO1.1+BB1 #3 and 6 are double transformants:
 +
 +
( cut RO1 --> band of ~900bp, plasmid-900bp
 +
 +
RO2 --> band of 1.8 kb, plasmid - 1.8 kb
 +
 +
BB --> band of ~ 200bp, 400bp, plasmid - 600bp )
 +
 +
 +
 +
Started protocol to clone the "simple" LovTap into an iGEM plasmid: did the PCR on LovTap with primers that contained the iGEM prefix and suffix
 +
 +
==People in the lab==
 +
 +
Tú, Heidi
<html><center><a href="https://2009.igem.org/EPF-Lausanne/11_October_2009"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/thumb/6/61/Flèche_gauche.png/70px-Flèche_gauche.png"></a>   
<html><center><a href="https://2009.igem.org/EPF-Lausanne/11_October_2009"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/thumb/6/61/Flèche_gauche.png/70px-Flèche_gauche.png"></a>   

Latest revision as of 08:50, 18 October 2009

Contents

12 October 2009





Wet Lab

Digestion assay (with Pst1 and SpeI) in order to check the double transformant -KO strand JRG1046.

We checked 3 clones of each double transformant: RO1.1+BB1 and RO2.4+BB1.

N.B: RO1.1+BB1 clone #1 culture wasn't pink at all


Took image of agarose gel:

121009gel DTjrg1046.JPG



RO1.1+BB1 #3 and 6 are double transformants:

( cut RO1 --> band of ~900bp, plasmid-900bp

RO2 --> band of 1.8 kb, plasmid - 1.8 kb

BB --> band of ~ 200bp, 400bp, plasmid - 600bp )


Started protocol to clone the "simple" LovTap into an iGEM plasmid: did the PCR on LovTap with primers that contained the iGEM prefix and suffix

People in the lab

Tú, Heidi