"
Team:Paris/Ethics ethicallabbook
From 2009.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Christophe.R (Talk | contribs) (→Ethical Lab Book) |
Cha.olivier (Talk | contribs) (→Main - Methodology : Real time ethical reflexion) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | <span/ id="bottom">[https://2009.igem.org/ iGEM ] > [[Team:Paris#top | Paris]] > [[Team:Paris/ | + | <span/ id="bottom">[https://2009.igem.org/ iGEM ] > [[Team:Paris#top | Paris]] > [[Team:Paris/Ethics_overview#bottom | Ethics]] > [[Team:Paris/Ethics_ethicallabbook#bottom | Ethical LabBook]] >[[Team:Paris/Ethics_ethicallabbook#bottom | Main]] |
{{Template:Paris2009}} | {{Template:Paris2009}} | ||
{{Template:Paris2009_menu5}} | {{Template:Paris2009_menu5}} | ||
| - | == | + | |
| + | ==Main - Methodology : Real time ethical reflexion== | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
<style type="text/css"> | <style type="text/css"> | ||
| Line 11: | Line 12: | ||
width: 30px; | width: 30px; | ||
top: 0px; | top: 0px; | ||
| - | left: | + | left: 130px; |
margin-top:10px; | margin-top:10px; | ||
padding-top: 7px; | padding-top: 7px; | ||
| Line 20: | Line 21: | ||
#middle-side { | #middle-side { | ||
height: 25px; | height: 25px; | ||
| - | width: | + | width: 410px; |
position: absolute; | position: absolute; | ||
top: 0px; | top: 0px; | ||
| - | left: | + | left: 140px; |
margin-top:10px; | margin-top:10px; | ||
padding-top: 5px; | padding-top: 5px; | ||
| Line 37: | Line 38: | ||
padding-top: 7px; | padding-top: 7px; | ||
top: 0px; | top: 0px; | ||
| - | left: | + | left: 530px; |
background: url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/4/40/Right_menu_paris.png); | background: url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/4/40/Right_menu_paris.png); | ||
z-index:4; | z-index:4; | ||
| Line 63: | Line 64: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div id="right-side"></div> | <div id="right-side"></div> | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | |||
</html> | </html> | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | + | As other iGEM 09 teams, we plan to have a significant ethical reflection component as part of our « message in a bubble » project in particular and synthetic biology in general. | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| + | Thus, we launched an anthropological study of the Paris team in parallel with the iGEM 09 competition preparation, coupled with ethical reflection, and it lead us to perform it in a special way. | ||
| + | We decided to have an everyday thematic one hour talk about ethics and social practices in science and biology. | ||
| + | We decided to make these talks reachable for everyone, even if something more constructed will be, at least, produce. You'll find on this wiki page the talk reports, with questions asked to the team and the main argument of the discussions. It should also be considered as an exercise and a report of experimental and anthropological thought. | ||
| + | This should be regarded as an ethical and anthropological « lab book », as an everyday, real time look on the reflection of the Paris' team about these kind of questions. | ||
| - | '''''Enjoy our daily mileage in | + | |
| + | '''''Enjoy our daily mileage in ethics, sociology, life science and synthetic biology !''''' | ||
*[[Team:Paris/Brainstorm_ideafirstweek| Introduction]] | *[[Team:Paris/Brainstorm_ideafirstweek| Introduction]] | ||
| - | ** Why ethical | + | ** Why ethical reflection in science? life science? synthetic biology? |
** Team brainstorming about synthetic biology definition | ** Team brainstorming about synthetic biology definition | ||
*[[Team:Paris/Brainstorm_ideasecondweek| Practices ]] | *[[Team:Paris/Brainstorm_ideasecondweek| Practices ]] | ||
| Line 92: | Line 86: | ||
*[[Team:Paris/Brainstorm_ideafourthweek| Ethics implications in our project ]] | *[[Team:Paris/Brainstorm_ideafourthweek| Ethics implications in our project ]] | ||
** What about ethical question in our project ? | ** What about ethical question in our project ? | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{Template:Paris2009_guided|Ethics_overview#top|Brainstorm_ideafirstweek#bottom}} | ||
Latest revision as of 15:34, 21 October 2009
iGEM > Paris > Ethics > Ethical LabBook > Main
Main - Methodology : Real time ethical reflexion
As other iGEM 09 teams, we plan to have a significant ethical reflection component as part of our « message in a bubble » project in particular and synthetic biology in general.
Thus, we launched an anthropological study of the Paris team in parallel with the iGEM 09 competition preparation, coupled with ethical reflection, and it lead us to perform it in a special way. We decided to have an everyday thematic one hour talk about ethics and social practices in science and biology. We decided to make these talks reachable for everyone, even if something more constructed will be, at least, produce. You'll find on this wiki page the talk reports, with questions asked to the team and the main argument of the discussions. It should also be considered as an exercise and a report of experimental and anthropological thought. This should be regarded as an ethical and anthropological « lab book », as an everyday, real time look on the reflection of the Paris' team about these kind of questions.
Enjoy our daily mileage in ethics, sociology, life science and synthetic biology !
- Introduction
- Why ethical reflection in science? life science? synthetic biology?
- Team brainstorming about synthetic biology definition
- Practices
- DIY in synthetic biology
- Ethics implications in our project
- What about ethical question in our project ?
