Team:UNICAMP-Brazil/Notebooks/September 23

From 2009.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(→PY Promoter - New strategy)
(→CeaB and CeiB: colony PCR)
 
(3 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
====F plasmid recircularization====
====F plasmid recircularization====
-
*<p style=”text-align:justify;”>The ligation reaction was assembled according to [https://2009.igem.org/Team:UNICAMP-Brazil/Protocols/T4_DNA_Ligase Protocol 11]. Both the plasmid samples were used to recircularization. The reaction tubes was kept O/N at 4°C.</p>
+
*<p style=”text-align:justify;”>The ligation reaction was assembled according to [https://2009.igem.org/Team:UNICAMP-Brazil/Protocols/T4_DNA_Ligase Protocol 11]. Both the plasmid samples were used in recircularization. The reaction tubes was kept O/N at 4°C.</p>
''Gabriel''
''Gabriel''
Line 18: Line 18:
''Marcelo''
''Marcelo''
-
==== PY Promoter - New strategy ====
 
-
*<p style=”text-align:justify;”>Our cloning strategy for inserting PY1 and PY2 fragments into the plasmid containing the RFP reporter didn’t work as we expected. We believe that one of our problems is the compatible cohesive ends produced by the enzymes XbaI and SpeI. As other members of our team are facing this same problem, our group decided to create another strategy to construct our biobricks. This new strategy is based on the pGEM vector system and consists basically in cloning our fragments in this vector and then excising them with EcoRI and SpeI. After the excision our fragment won’t have compatible cohesive ends anymore. (See [https://2009.igem.org/Team:UNICAMP-Brazil/Protocols/pGEMStrategy pGEM cloning strategy] for more information).</p>
 
-
*<p style=”text-align:justify;”>So today we started to work in this new strategy. First of all we digested our fragments PY1 and PY2 (amplified by PCR from F plasmid) and pGEM vector with SpeI. The digestion lasted for 3 hours.</p>
+
==== CeaB and CeiB: colony PCR ====
-
*<p style=”text-align:justify;”>After the digestion we performed 2 ligation reactions following [https://2009.igem.org/Team:UNICAMP-Brazil/Protocols/T4_DNA_Ligase Protocol 11]: PY1 + pGEM and PY2 + pGEM.</p>
+
*<p style=”text-align:justify;”>We got apparently good transformations but we have to prove the correct position of DNA inserted. So, we performed colony PCR with right primers.</p>
 +
 
 +
[[Image:23_sept..jpg‎ ‎ |center|‎]]
 +
 
 +
*<p style=”text-align:justify;”>We didn’t get the band size expected and we found unspecific amplification, therefore we will make miniprep and we will try PCR again.</p>
 +
 
 +
''Ane''
-
''Fabi and Léo''
 
{{:Team:UNICAMP-Brazil/inc_rodape}}
{{:Team:UNICAMP-Brazil/inc_rodape}}

Latest revision as of 03:06, 22 October 2009

Topo l2.gif topo_r_igem.gif
topo_r_b.gif
Back to Calendar

ColiGuard

F plasmid recircularization

  • The ligation reaction was assembled according to Protocol 11. Both the plasmid samples were used in recircularization. The reaction tubes was kept O/N at 4°C.

Gabriel

finO and finP - Still Trying to Confirm our Biobricks

  • Today we performed minipreps from yesterday's inoculated cultures, according to Protocol 2.

Marcelo


CeaB and CeiB: colony PCR

  • We got apparently good transformations but we have to prove the correct position of DNA inserted. So, we performed colony PCR with right primers.

‎

  • We didn’t get the band size expected and we found unspecific amplification, therefore we will make miniprep and we will try PCR again.

Ane





Retrieved from "http://2009.igem.org/Team:UNICAMP-Brazil/Notebooks/September_23"