Team:UNICAMP-Brazil/Notebooks/October 3
From 2009.igem.org
(→ColiGuard) |
(→PY Promoter - New strategy) |
||
(6 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
====Cre-Recombinase without ATG + pSB1A3 transformation==== | ====Cre-Recombinase without ATG + pSB1A3 transformation==== | ||
- | *<p style=”text-align:justify;”>Today we transformed the Cre-Recombinase without ATG + pSB1A3 in ''E. coli'' DH10B eletrocompetent cells. We then plated on LB | + | *<p style=”text-align:justify;”>Today we transformed the Cre-Recombinase without ATG + pSB1A3 ligation, performed yesterday, in ''E. coli'' DH10B eletrocompetent cells. We then plated on LB-AMP plate, according to information from registry page.</p> |
''Victor'' | ''Victor'' | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
====Kamikaze’s parts digestion and ligation==== | ====Kamikaze’s parts digestion and ligation==== | ||
- | *<p style=”text-align:justify;”> We made the digestion of BBa K112806 with EcoRI and SpeI, BBa B0015 with | + | *<p style=”text-align:justify;”> We made the digestion of BBa K112806 with EcoRI and SpeI, BBa B0015 with ''EcoR''I and ''Xba''I and BBa I746911 with ''Spe''I and ''Pst''I. </p> |
*<p style=”text-align:justify;”> We purified the digestion and made the ligation of BBa K112806 in the BBa B0015 plasmid according to the [https://2009.igem.org/Team:UNICAMP-Brazil/Protocols/T4_DNA_Ligase Protocol 11] </p> | *<p style=”text-align:justify;”> We purified the digestion and made the ligation of BBa K112806 in the BBa B0015 plasmid according to the [https://2009.igem.org/Team:UNICAMP-Brazil/Protocols/T4_DNA_Ligase Protocol 11] </p> | ||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
==== PY Promoter - New strategy ==== | ==== PY Promoter - New strategy ==== | ||
- | *<p style=”text-align:justify;”>Our cloning strategy for inserting PY1 and PY2 fragments into the plasmid containing the RFP reporter didn’t work as we expected. We believe that one of our problems is the compatible cohesive ends produced by the enzymes | + | *<p style=”text-align:justify;”>Our cloning strategy for inserting PY1 and PY2 fragments into the plasmid containing the RFP reporter didn’t work as we expected. We believe that one of our problems is the compatible cohesive ends produced by the enzymes ''Xba''I and ''Spe''I. As other members of our team are facing this same problem, our group decided to create another strategy to construct our biobricks. This new strategy is based on the pGEM vector system and consists basically in cloning our fragments in this vector and then excising them with ''EcoR''I and ''Spe''I. After the excision our fragment won’t have compatible cohesive ends anymore. (See [https://2009.igem.org/Team:UNICAMP-Brazil/Protocols/pGEMStrategy pGEM cloning strategy] for more information).</p> |
- | *<p style=”text-align:justify;”>So today we started to work in this new strategy. First of all we digested our fragments PY1 and PY2 (amplified by PCR from F plasmid) and pGEM vector with | + | *<p style=”text-align:justify;”>So today we started to work in this new strategy. First of all we digested our fragments PY1 and PY2 (amplified by PCR from F plasmid) and pGEM vector with ''Spe''I. The digestion lasted for 3 hours.</p> |
*<p style=”text-align:justify;”>After the digestion we performed 2 ligation reactions following [https://2009.igem.org/Team:UNICAMP-Brazil/Protocols/T4_DNA_Ligase Protocol 11]: PY1 + pGEM and PY2 + pGEM.</p> | *<p style=”text-align:justify;”>After the digestion we performed 2 ligation reactions following [https://2009.igem.org/Team:UNICAMP-Brazil/Protocols/T4_DNA_Ligase Protocol 11]: PY1 + pGEM and PY2 + pGEM.</p> | ||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
==''' YeastGuard '''== | ==''' YeastGuard '''== | ||
- | ====New | + | ====[https://2009.igem.org/Team:UNICAMP-Brazil/Protocols/pGEMStrategy New Strategy: pGEM]==== |
- | + | ||
*<p style=”text-align:justify;”>The ligation reactions didn´t work. So today we decided not to digest the fragment and the pGEM vector with ''SpeI'', but to ligate it directly, considering that we can confirm the correct insertion by PCR.</p> | *<p style=”text-align:justify;”>The ligation reactions didn´t work. So today we decided not to digest the fragment and the pGEM vector with ''SpeI'', but to ligate it directly, considering that we can confirm the correct insertion by PCR.</p> | ||
Latest revision as of 03:44, 22 October 2009
|