"
Team:Paris/Transduction overview2 strategy
From 2009.igem.org
Christophe.R (Talk | contribs) |
Christophe.R (Talk | contribs) (→Our strategy: The Fec operon) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Template:Paris2009}} | {{Template:Paris2009}} | ||
{{Template:Paris2009_menu4}} | {{Template:Paris2009_menu4}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| Line 54: | Line 56: | ||
margin-top:10px; | margin-top:10px; | ||
padding-top: 7px; | padding-top: 7px; | ||
| - | background: url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/ | + | background: url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/4/40/Left_menu_paris2.png); |
z-index:4; | z-index:4; | ||
} | } | ||
| Line 66: | Line 68: | ||
margin-top:10px; | margin-top:10px; | ||
padding-top: 5px; | padding-top: 5px; | ||
| - | background: | + | background: white; |
z-index:5; | z-index:5; | ||
} | } | ||
| Line 78: | Line 80: | ||
top: 35px; | top: 35px; | ||
left: 490px; | left: 490px; | ||
| - | background: url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/ | + | background: url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/f/f8/Right_menu_paris2.png); |
z-index:4; | z-index:4; | ||
} | } | ||
| Line 125: | Line 127: | ||
'''problems :''' the message is unidirectionnal and unrepeatable. It would just be a proof of principle that a vesicle-mediated controlled communication is possible. | '''problems :''' the message is unidirectionnal and unrepeatable. It would just be a proof of principle that a vesicle-mediated controlled communication is possible. | ||
| + | <html> | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | <div id="paris_content_boxtop"> | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | <div id="paris_content"> | ||
| + | </html> | ||
==Our strategy: The trick TCS== | ==Our strategy: The trick TCS== | ||
| Line 132: | Line 140: | ||
Even if the idea of creating a synthethic protein was very attractive, it would have been difficult to have concrete result in just 3 months. | Even if the idea of creating a synthethic protein was very attractive, it would have been difficult to have concrete result in just 3 months. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | {{Template:Paris2009_guided|Transduction_overview2_transduction#bottom|Ethics_overview#top}} | ||
Latest revision as of 20:47, 21 October 2009
iGEM > Paris > Receiving the message > Our strategy
Our strategy: The Fec operon
Few ABC transporter such as FecABCD (iron transporter) are able to induce a response regardless of the tranlocation, due to the activity of FecA, moreover some mutant can also have a constitutive expression of FecABCD .
The plan would be to use FecA- mutant receiver and FecA+ mutant donor to transfert the constitutive FecA protein to the receiver. In this case the receiver will express the FecABCD operon without being induce by ferric citrate in the medium , and so we could place under the control of the Fec ABCD promoter, which is called pfec, the gene sequence encoding for the response. For the moment a response that would be easy to detect is the fluorescence of the RFP and the biobrick BBa-J61002 is the perfect candidate to test the system.
We also discovered that some fecR and fecI mutants can be use to amplify the signal because they have a constitutive activity. So we put under the control of pfec a FecR and FecI mutated. When they will be expressed, they will be activators of pfec and consequently of RFP. Normaly we would be able to obtain a increasing fluorescence.
problems : the message is unidirectionnal and unrepeatable. It would just be a proof of principle that a vesicle-mediated controlled communication is possible.
Our strategy: The trick TCS
We could ,with the help of Alfonso Jaramillo, design a synthetic PBP which could detect the substrate we choosed and activate a specific HK. The previous work done by Valencia in 2006 was to design vanilin-sensitive PBP and a network for a graduated response whereas we just need a proteic sensitive PBP and a binary type of response.
Even if the idea of creating a synthethic protein was very attractive, it would have been difficult to have concrete result in just 3 months.
