"
Team:Paris/Ethics ethicalreport
From 2009.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Christophe.R (Talk | contribs) |
Christophe.R (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
padding-top: 7px; | padding-top: 7px; | ||
top: 0px; | top: 0px; | ||
| - | left: | + | left: 680px; |
background: url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/4/40/Right_menu_paris.png); | background: url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/4/40/Right_menu_paris.png); | ||
z-index:4; | z-index:4; | ||
Revision as of 23:16, 19 October 2009
iGEM > Paris > Ethic > Ethical LabBook > Main
The Paris team ethical and sociological report
- Preface
- Methods
- Introduction
- A.Perspectives from the field of ethics : polyphony and the moral imperative.
- B.Perspectives from the scientific field : considering the social world.
- I.Biosafety and biosecurity concerns
- A. Biosafety
- B. Biosecurity
- II. Naturality and Artificiality.
- A. From “what” do we have to protect nature?
- B. Performing Lexicon : The playing God issue?
- C. A false question? ...
- D. … An ironical answer
- E. What “real question”? : Practices and alienability of the living.
- F. Conclusion
- III. Practices
- A. What form for what life science?
- B. Self or Exploded governance?
- C. Forms of critics
- D. To finish with... A case study
- Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- References
- Appendices: Reports of the collective discussion in the team : Real time ethical reflexion.
