"
Team:Paris/Ethics ethicalreport
From 2009.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Christophe.R (Talk | contribs) |
Christophe.R (Talk | contribs) (→The Paris team ethical and sociological report) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
width: 30px; | width: 30px; | ||
top: 0px; | top: 0px; | ||
| - | left: | + | left: -10px; |
margin-top:10px; | margin-top:10px; | ||
padding-top: 7px; | padding-top: 7px; | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
#middle-side { | #middle-side { | ||
height: 25px; | height: 25px; | ||
| - | width: | + | width: 700px; |
position: absolute; | position: absolute; | ||
top: 0px; | top: 0px; | ||
| - | left: | + | left: 0px; |
margin-top:10px; | margin-top:10px; | ||
padding-top: 5px; | padding-top: 5px; | ||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
padding-top: 7px; | padding-top: 7px; | ||
top: 0px; | top: 0px; | ||
| - | left: | + | left: 680px; |
background: url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/4/40/Right_menu_paris.png); | background: url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/4/40/Right_menu_paris.png); | ||
z-index:4; | z-index:4; | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
width: 30px; | width: 30px; | ||
top: 35px; | top: 35px; | ||
| - | left: | + | left: 120px; |
margin-top:10px; | margin-top:10px; | ||
padding-top: 7px; | padding-top: 7px; | ||
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
#middle-side2 { | #middle-side2 { | ||
height: 25px; | height: 25px; | ||
| - | width: | + | width: 420px; |
position: absolute; | position: absolute; | ||
top: 35px; | top: 35px; | ||
| - | left: | + | left: 130px; |
margin-top:10px; | margin-top:10px; | ||
padding-top: 5px; | padding-top: 5px; | ||
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
padding-top: 7px; | padding-top: 7px; | ||
top: 35px; | top: 35px; | ||
| - | left: | + | left: 540px; |
background: url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/4/40/Right_menu_paris.png); | background: url(https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2009/4/40/Right_menu_paris.png); | ||
z-index:4; | z-index:4; | ||
Revision as of 12:27, 21 October 2009
iGEM > Paris > Ethics > Ethical Report > Main
The Paris team ethical and sociological report
- Preface
- Methods
- Introduction
- A.Perspectives from the field of ethics : polyphony and the moral imperative.
- B.Perspectives from the scientific field : considering the social world.
- I.Biosafety and biosecurity concerns
- A. Biosafety
- B. Biosecurity
- II. Naturality and Artificiality.
- A. From “what” do we have to protect nature?
- B. Performing Lexicon : The playing God issue?
- C. A false question? ...
- D. … An ironical answer
- E. What “real question”? : Practices and alienability of the living.
- F. Conclusion
- III. Practices
- A. What form for what life science?
- B. Self or Exploded governance?
- C. Forms of critics
- D. To finish with... A case study
- Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- References
- Appendices: Reports of the collective discussion in the team : Real time ethical reflexion.
