Team:Groningen/Project Plan/Risk List

From 2009.igem.org

Revision as of 15:03, 2 May 2009 by Nienke (Talk | contribs)

Igemhomelogo.png

Introduction

Every project has to deal with risks. To ensure a smoothly running project without too many large hiccups it is important to identify these risks and develop strategies to avoid them (and/or reduce their impact).

The table below, shows the possible risks that may influence the success of the iGEM project. It gives an outline of 5 main risks, namely problems which emerge from finances, time span, lab work, modeling and members / instructors. Possible risks were traced from the problems of iGEM Groningen 2008 and of the iGEM 2008 teams which were withdrawn from the competition.

Also see UPEDU's description of the Risk List artifact and the enclosing artifact, our project plan.

Risks

For each risk the following is documented:

  • Identifier: a descriptive (short) name
  • Magnitude: ranking from 1-10, 1 is low risk and 10 is a high risk. Taking in account: how probable and severe the problem is.
  • Description: a brief description of the risk.
  • Impact:
    • C = critical, there is a real problem but when it is noticed in an early stage it can probably be solved, all the project members are affected.
    • H = high impact, the probability of the projects success is seriously affected. There is an immediate need for a meeting with the stakeholders.
    • M= medium impact, there is a real problem but when it is noticed in an early stage it can be solved, not all members are affected.
    • L= low impact, if this risk can not be avoided, probably the team will decide to live with it.
  • Indicators: when do we know this risk has materialized (or better yet, is about to materialize).
  • Mitigation Strategy: how are we reducing the impact of this risk?
  • Contingency Plan: what can we do if this risk does materialize?

[NEW! The first risk table (might need revising ;)]

Risk 1: Finances
Magnitude Description Impact Mitigation Plan Contingency Plan
6 NoFunding. If we do not get any more funding we may not be able to cover our budget. This may mean that some things will not be possible. C Our budget should largely be covered before the summer.We already have some funds and are attempting to acquire more. Send letters to (non)-governmental / university organisations and companies.
7 PR letters do not work out well C Letters contain information about: Synthetic Biology, the iGEM competition, contact information. Try to find out what went wrong, call the organisations and companies. Ask a specialist to have a look at the sponsor letter.
6 [München] Probably had too low budget because they started only in June with looking for sponsoring H A budget plan has been made. Roles are divided, two people are working on letters/flyers/poster for sponsoring. Ask instructors for help, start with fundraising already before a final project is chosen.
[TODO: More tables will be added about some other risks]